Anonymous #1 4w

That doesn’t seem to directly engage with anything I said. I can see how it’s tangentially related, but I’m not sure what your point is?

1

Anonymous #2 4w

88 percent of the top one percent are white. 30 percent are Jewish. I did make up those stats by the way. But after googling it, fucking nailed it. I’m just that cool.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

That’s what happens when you join the left you just say shit and the world conforms around your statement to make it true it’s wild

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

99%to 88% is a pretty big change

8

Anonymous #2 4w

Not really.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Not in comparison between thirty and eighty eight percent. The number could be 70% and my point would still be made effectively.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

11% difference when it comes to statistics is pretty significant

6

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Also when looking at global billionaires white/European is maybe 55%

8

Anonymous #2 4w

Sure semantically, but my point wasn’t about the exact number it was about the existing gap between the two. Which is about as wide as I described say a few percentage points. But whatever you need to keep blaming the Jews ig?

1

Anonymous #2 4w

I’m talking about america primarily. Ofc if you look globally the number is smaller, some places have this really cool thing where they’re close to the equator and it makes the people there darker skinned. You should google that shit

-1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Im not blaming the jews, just simply pointing out how flawed your point and numbers are

6

Anonymous #2 4w

Except my point stands just fine as it is?

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

“But say literally nothing about 99 percent of all the world's wealthiest people being white.” No, you were clearly speaking about it on a global scale

8

Anonymous #2 4w

Even with the accurate numbers? Nothing about my point has been harmed by the 99 percent going to 88. The message of white people still overwhelmingly having control over the nationals wealth, and as you so helpfully pointed out, the worlds, is the point.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Interesting, seems as if white people aren’t the leaders when it comes to median household income

5

Anonymous #2 4w

Are we talking about median household income?

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Same conclusion when you look at the data this way

7

Anonymous #2 4w

When’s the other shoe gonna drop is the real question.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

What other shoe? Where you say if you’re speaking nationality or globally

7

Anonymous #2 4w

You know what other shoe lmao.

1

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Tell me

7

Anonymous #2 4w

No I’d prefer to just wait. Continue.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Are you stalling so you can come up with a counterpoint

9

Anonymous #2 4w

Counter point to what?

0

Anonymous #2 4w

What’s been disproven?

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Ahhh yeah that’s it, well if you come up with something lmk

10

Anonymous #2 4w

I asked you what’s been disproven?

0

Anonymous #2 4w

Just that the number isn’t 99, it’s 88? Idrc…?

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Do you actually have data or numbers for anything or are we still working on vibes

6

Anonymous #2 4w

I already gave you data?

0

Anonymous #2 4w

But at the moment I’ve been less focused on this conversation in favor of cooking this deer

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

No you haven’t, all you’ve done is make up numbers

7

Anonymous #2 4w

I gave you the 88 and 30 percent stats I can source them if you want

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Sourcing them is sort of required when talking about data 97% of people agree

6

Anonymous #2 4w

Good joke, yeah I’ll source it later. The other shoe is when you start Nazi posting btw.

0

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 4w

Nazi posting because im saying your numbers are incorrect? For pointing out white households aren’t “superior” when it comes to median household income? Holy deflection bro seek help

1