Anonymous #1 1w

Questionable how important he was

10

Anonymous #2 1w

Sure but he clearly wasn’t a nobody either. It just feels like the “an important person” part is meant to distinguish between random people killing each other over politics/religion as opposed to purposefully killing someone notable with the intent to gain notoriety or spread fear

1

Anonymous #1 1w

so if you were killed in that sense of your definition your family could say you were assassinated?

4

Anonymous #3 1w

Right bc who defines whether the person was important or not. It can’t be subjective

6

Anonymous #3 1w

Maybe if they were an important leader of an organization like Charlie was and as laid out in the example

0

Anonymous #4 1w

Important isn’t subjective

0

Anonymous #3 1w

I mean probably not because I’m not anyone notable and I don’t know what political or religious reason someone would kill me for

0

Anonymous #4 1w

It’s not my definition dog it’s literally from Oxford dictionary

0

Anonymous #3 1w

I think it means important as in widespread influence which Charlie Kirk had widespread influence

1