Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 2w
I, a liberal, acknowledge the fraud occurring in California and Minnesota
comment

19
upvote -15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

i acknowledge fraud that is investigated and prosecuted, not “fraud” that “journalists” “find” by knocking on random doors in a medical plaza

upvote 98 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Not gonna say fraud doesn’t matter but complaining about a small daycare (they weren’t even) vs the millions of fraud the 1% does is crazy.

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

what, so independent journalists are just gunk then

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

try again

upvote 38 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

is that what you’re saying?

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Nick Shirley is not a journalist

upvote 34 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

says who

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Journalist (Merriam-Webster) a : a person engaged in journalism especially a writer or editor for a news medium b : a writer who aims at a mass audience

upvote 27 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

brother there is literally a clip of Nick Shirley trying to dunk on Andrew Callaghan for not speaking on Charlie Kirk’s assassination, which Callaghan did, and then Nick Shirley’s response to being informed that Andrew Callaghan actually made a comprehensive statement on Kirk’s death was “well i didn’t watch it”. Willfully ignoring evidence does not a journalist make.

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

I thought he was an “independent journalist”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

i don’t know why all the democrats don’t want to acknowledge fraud, regardless of who discovers it like as a republican i have no issue saying kash patel should be in prison for perjury after lying to congress and the people about the epstein files

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

nick shirley didnt discover anything, the videos were pure slop

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

calling him an independent journalist is very generous to what he’s actually doing imo.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

then why did tim waltz drop out of reelection, and why did CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, and all the major news outlets pick up the story

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

for profit news outlets covering a trending topic does not mean the fraud was real bud. that requires an actual federal investigation which to this day has not happened yet

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

no you don’t get it they only care when it’s people of color, immigrants, or other marginalized people. none of it has ever been about fraud, it’s about cutting racial agit prop by putting a fresh coat of paint on the ‘welfare queen’ trope

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

I agree, I said that they weren’t even doing fraud in my comments. I was just acknowledging the outrage is disingenuous

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

oh yeah i’m just dunking on chuds it was gonna be like a sarcastic post when i typed ‘no you don’t get it’ and then i like actually ideated in the second half

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

We all know you don't want it to be investigated and prosecuted tho 🙄

upvote -2 downvote