Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Because it would make it harder for whites to deniably exploit black people
This post is unavailable
upvote 9 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

White people would just not have to deny it then though????

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

Yes they would, for the same reason they deny it now

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

If segregation is instituted then discrimination would just be the legally enforced rule instead of something shitty people do

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

And?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

Like have y’all forgotten why the civil rights movement happened in the first place? It was only 60 years ago. Is social memory that short?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

The surface reason or the real reason?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

Segregation was terrible and people fought against it for a reason. It forced black people into worse neighborhoods and worse schools. Because the white community had more access to finance (from the investment of white governments, wage discrimination, the legacy of slavery, loan discrimination), the white establishments would almost always be higher quality. And then black people, despite the odds, built something great (like in Tulsa), white racists would try to destroy it.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

Segregation would be terrible even if the communities had equal level of finance, because people should be able to be friends with other ethnicities AND race is a construct so you can never create accurate lines. But the communities DONT have equal level of finance or population so that means minorities will have it worse.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

Lmao bro thinks all of that ended in 1964

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

Segregation didnt end completely. The financial legacies of redlining still exist, school segregation slowly re-instituted itself, and employment discrimination still exists. But it’s objectively different from when people weren’t allowed to go to the beach because they were black. And your response to “these shitty things didn’t end completely” is “bring back the shitty things in full”?

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

Girl what? I said the reason it hasn’t (and probably won’t) come back is because it would make it harder for whites to deny their exploitative policy practices

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

Ok, I read your original comment as claiming something like “segregation would remove the ability for white people to exploit black people.” That’s seemingly what OOP thinks, assuming they are responsible for the several posts along those lines yesterday.

upvote 1 downvote