Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
non-maga trump voters be like “yeah i voted for a Nazi, but that doesn’t mean I AM one!!!!”
upvote 23 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Not everyone can comprehend how people work

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Oh I know how the delusion works - but here’s the thing. A vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. It doesn’t matter if your reasons were for pure economics or if you were a raging KKK member who wanted to hurt as many minorities as possible - BOTH VOTES ARE THE SAME. If you helped put a Nazi in office - for ANY reason - you are responsible for what the Nazi wreaks.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Yes, two real numbers can be the same when rounded

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Not even remotely equivalent. You don’t get to pick and choose which policies you vote for when you vote - you vote for the WHOLE POLITICIAN. And trump was Not subtle about any of this. If you chose to IGNORE his rhetoric around minorities and the opposition, it doesn’t make you not a nazi - it makes you the useful idiot nazi.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Why do you feel the need to make a moral performance for people that do not know you?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Why are you trying to reframe a perfectly logical and rational argument into a moral one? It couldn’t be that you can’t think of a way I’m wrong, is it?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Why do you pretend to know people if you cannot absolve your thinking from your mental devices?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

No, try again! That wasn’t an answer to my question, silly! My argument is logical! The fuck does Abstraction have to do with that?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Why, if you are against the delusional, do you practice their words and mannerisms?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

I can see your self-assured confidence, though you have much to unlearn 😐

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

So believe it or not, spouting polysyllabic gibberish doesn’t actually count as rhetoric

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

It is not so wrong to return what is given. What makes you think you know the people I know, better than I, if you do not know them at all?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

“It is not so wrong to return what is given.” I was exceptionally clear and concise with my phrasing. You have to be, what with character limits and all. … If you cannot understand it, that reflects more on you than it does on me.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Is the delivery of your rhetoric what you are concerned with more than its actual value? I know exactly what you said.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

… evidently, you don’t. please continue trying to convince us you do, though.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Evidence is of no concern to the delusional, so why do you concern yourself with it? How do you manage to construct boxes that nobody fits in?

upvote -2 downvote