Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 9w
It’s okay to admit you were conned by a felon who made false promises. What’s not okay is defending that felon after you found out he is accused of raping a 13 year old. Proven in court or not that is not someone you should be voting for president.
comment

5
upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Source? My understanding is no credible, corroborated evidence exists to support that pedo allegation

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

My source is Katie Johnson’s testimony and the countless other women that have accused Trump of raping them. Voting for a guy who admits to running pageants to walk into dressing rooms is not a defensible choice to make

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

“Katie Johnson” was an anonymous Jane Doe lawsuit, which never saw court, and was repeatedly dismissed or withdrawn. I repeat: no evidence (if it even exists) ever saw court. The case was voluntarily withdrawn —— On top of that……. The Guardian did an investigative report and found the lawsuit was linked to a TV Producer called Norm Lubow who has a history of making fraudulent claims.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

Cool that doesn’t change the fact that a) he’s been held legally liable for raping E Jean Carroll, b) recorded admitting to groping women, c) hosted calendar girl parties with epstein and underage models as the only guests, d) was introduced to Melania by Epstein, etc etc etc the man is a rapist and you are defending him

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

Also the case was voluntarily withdrawn, not dismissed. See: FBI report of a Trump accuser stating she was threatened if she ever came forward with her allegations

post
upvote 4 downvote