Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
call me crazy but i dont trust the word of a perjurer. lie under oath under threat? i believe youll do it again when youre presented with awards.
26 upvotes, 4 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "call me crazy but i dont trust the word of a perjurer.
lie under oath under threat? i believe youll do it again when youre presented with awards."
upvote 26 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3d

So he wants this to look even worse for himself. Going easy on a child sex trafficker so she can say you’re innocent. Fucking vile

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3d

This is her using what she knows as a bargaining chip. You have to pick one: Do you want the living of the 2 ringleaders to share what she knows so you can go after the rest? Or do you want to let her rot in jail and not get any of the info? Be fr dude, anyone who cares about the victims would take the deal even if it means her life in prison is in a min. security facility

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3d

We know that she won’t tell the truth though. She’s already been convicted of perjury in the past. She’s basically explicitly saying she will lie in Trump’s favor in exchange for clemency. With that in mind, I think allowing one of the most notorious pedophiles back on the streets is a bad idea.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3d

She was never convicted of perjury, and if she does lie then the court will have full liberty to make that clear. And clemency does not mean a pardon. Like I said, anyone should want to take the testimony of the only living leader of a major criminal operation. Especially if the only concession is upgrading her to a min security prison.

upvote 1 downvote