Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Sure I’ll refute you. First define socialism.
I posted this yesterday and NOBODY has been able to refute me.
upvote 27 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Quote OP here. Government overreach is textbook socialism. Ive done the research myself as a polisci major

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

i can’t help but notice that this is not a comprehensive definition of socialism.

upvote 24 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Definitions dont have to be "comprehensive" to be accurate. The one i provided is backed up by hours of research

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

You have two words as the definition : “government overreach” … that is unhelpful to the debate and seems purposefully obtuse. if you want a debate, it makes sense to start with a basic unbiased definition like in the dictionary or, more appropriately, your textbooks.

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Buddy, “government overreach” is not the definition of socialism lmao.

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Yes. Yes they do. For example. Define fruit Apples are fruit Yes but that’s not comprehensive So what

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Trump is imposing illegal tariffs. Mamdani is trying to impose Sharia law. Both are going beyond their consititutional powers. Hitler became a dictator by doing the same. OVERREACH is the common denominator

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Buddy, I'm literally a poli sci major.

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

No it is not.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Also, I consult research not textbooks

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

If the common denominator was “overreach” then every single corrupt government is socialist. Which is fucking stupid.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

Yeah but governments are more complicated then fruits

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I’m going to suggest we block #1 because they’re obviously trolling with the poly sci, no textbook, Sharia law combo

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Not according to your logic so far, your logic has literally boiled down to “government bad mean socialist”

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

"i can't prove you wrong" "you must be a troll" Nice argument 🤣

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

well all bad governments are socialist and vice versa

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

not every government. For example, Schumer and Jeffries use common sense in the federal government while Newsom is the best governor in a century. All have more centrist policies and are therefor not socialist

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Therefore* dipshit

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Your poly sci professors are very disappointed lmao.

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

ad hominem attacks on spelling doesnt make you right. also my professors let me do my own research hows that for disappointment

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Using 6 definitions wrong in comments with spelling errors doesn’t make you right either. Honestly this is some SEC school shit

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

“Eh this guys stupid just let them do whatever. Tell them to do ‘their own research’ lol” - #1s professors

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

Well nobody has yet proven me incorrect

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Jealous much 🤣

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Ignorance is bliss, I suppose maybe I am. It’s hard not being stupid.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Well at least you admit it. Leave the voting to centrists until your more educated

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

You mean the fat and elderly and brain dead? No sorry I’m gonna keep voting for extreme left candidates thanks

upvote 4 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Buddy, I’m literally not a polisci major, but I can tell you “government overreach” is *NOT* the definition of socialism

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Well if you live in nyc you can vote single ticket for trump and mamdani aka the SOCIALISTS

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

well literally AM a poli sci major and im telling government overreach is the defining trait of socialism (ive done the research to prove it)

upvote -3 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Yet you never checked a dictionary during that research. Your methods are flawed

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

The dictionary is bought out by socialist billionaires and collaborators with trump. Anyone who trusts them is immediately not worth considering, thats why i do my own research

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Storm front doesn’t count

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Just out of curiosity what are your research sources?

upvote 14 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

You have to be bullshitting. There’s no way you’re being serious

upvote 17 downvote