Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Doesn’t surprise me at all. Conservatives believe in the “diversity of thought.” They think outside the box. They challenge the status quo. Meanwhile liberals have a woke hive mind and regurgitate what they hear from CNN. No original ideas whatsoever.
This post is unavailable
upvote -9 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Conservatives have been pledging fealty for one NYC billionaire for the past 10 years, and have recently been primarying those who disagree

upvote 30 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w
post
upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

CNN? You have to be kidding. That’s like millennials and older. Corporate media is dying off across the board

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

He’s getting downvoted so it must mean he’s right

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Honestly, liberals think more freely than conservatives have ever dared. Most of us are agnostics or atheists, are well-educated, and can construct a reasoned argument as to why we believe something rather than citing an external authority like the Bible, the President, or Fox News.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

“We are mavericks. Among us are people who think the earth is flat, a donut, and a cube. Not like those dumb round earthers”

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

CARSON TUCKER 💀💀💀

upvote 27 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Who the fuck is Carson Tucker

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

I always am.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 9w

Being atheist or agnostic doesn’t mean you think more freely, as their arguments boil down to, “there’s no proof”

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

To be freethinking means to come to one’s own conclusion based on the evidence. Agnostics and atheists are arguing the null hypothesis, while people who believe in God because of religious texts really do not have proof that God exists or is with them, specifically. I am a Christian - but only because I have evidence that has convinced me that there is a God. And if my evidence is correct, then God is against much of this conservative push to suppress independent thought.

upvote 6 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

It’s more than “there’s no proof” it also boils down to god just sucks. Bro has paths already laid out for ppl, meaning he already knows ppl are gonna be shitty, meaning he doesn’t gaf if his creations end up in hell. They also say morality comes from god when god changes its morality constantly.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themind._.ofhueyfreeman25 9w

Saying god sucks doesn’t deny his existence

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 9w

If the “freethinking” is just choosing the null hypothesis due to lack of evidence then it is as equally freethinking to believe in god for some other reason, choosing one belief doesn’t make you more “freethinking”

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

I never claimed it did lmao. A lot of ppl don’t wanna believe in a being who will kill innocent ppl because he’s pissy with a few.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themind._.ofhueyfreeman25 9w

Alright

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

Exactly lmao

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themind._.ofhueyfreeman25 9w

lol even

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

Even what?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> themind._.ofhueyfreeman25 9w

Nothing

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

They come to the rational conclusion: if there is a lack of evidence to back up a belief, then that belief is probably false.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 9w

If you are thinking freely - that is, reasoning based on your own understanding and not merely accepting the authority of others - then, when confronted with a lack of evidence for a claim, you must reject the claim.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 9w

And if you find sufficient evidence to support another belief, some people adopt it, there are stories of atheists who convert to religion, they have the same logical framework as you and they came to a different conclusion. That is freedom of thought, freedom to choose. Freedom is not expecting everyone to come to the same conclusion in absence of authority

upvote 1 downvote