Anonymous #1 4w

Nick Fuentes is when ppl say stop dropping bombs on kids

25

Anonymous #2 4w

So no US involvement but yes massacre 30k+ people on the streets in two days?

-6

Anonymous #1 4w

when the involvement is a war crime yeah

5

Anonymous #3 4w

Good thing it's not

-2

Anonymous #1 4w

literally is bro, illegal under the UN Charter to attack a country unless it’s in self-defense which this very clearly wasn’t

3

Anonymous #3 4w

You know what is though? masscaraing 30k+ innocent civilians in the street in 2 days

-2

Anonymous #1 4w

Welcome to magachomo land where bombing kids isn’t a war crime and raping them doesn’t make you a pedophile

10

Anonymous #3 4w

International law is fake

-3

Anonymous #3 4w

Don’t you know that killing Iranian civilians is OUR job 🇺🇸

6

Anonymous #1 4w

so we should just disregard it?

2

Anonymous #3 4w

If it's in American interest absofuckinglutely. Don't get me wrong, that is not to say morality mustn't be considered.

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

imo war crimes are immoral idk ab you

1

Anonymous #3 4w

Murr UN says it immoral so it must be

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

idk attacking a country without them declaring war or attacking you seems unnecessary

1

Anonymous #1 4w

especially when they were willing to diplomatically de-escalate

1

Anonymous #1 4w

Bro needs the UN to tell him blowing up a school is a war crime so he can say nuh uh

9

Anonymous #2 4w

These people are lizards in human skin

5

Anonymous #3 4w

Diplomatically de-escalate after genociding their own people lmao. Death to the regime you already fucked up big time

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

Talking about morality, go fuck yourself

0

Anonymous #1 4w

i want the regime to be gone too, but outside intervention to install a regime in our own interests likely won’t be popular with the people leading to the same cycle of repression we see now

4

Anonymous #3 4w

I don't know how many Iranians you know, but the vast, vast majority, especially those who fled the country due to this theocratic abomination, viscerally hate the regime. The only people who still support it are the boomer terrorist fringe who are still shouting death to America

0

Anonymous #1 4w

American installment? Oh, you mean like the Shah? They were infetecamically better than the IRGC.

1

Anonymous #1 4w

I know how many Iranians want the regime gone, the regime is repressive and authoritarian, but killing the ayatollah doesn’t collapse the regime, and the collapse of the regime could lead to a different dictator or even a terrorist group taking charge like we’ve seen in other American interventions in places like Iraq, Syria, Somalia, etc.

6

Anonymous #1 4w

the Americans overthrew a democratically elected leader to install the Shah, who was unpopular and his reign literally led to Khamenei’s, it’s the U.S.’s fault this regime exists in the first place 😭

3

Anonymous #3 4w

Baseless speculation about the future vs the reality on the ground right now

1

Anonymous #1 4w

the reality on the ground is that Iranians are no more free today than they were 2 days ago

1

Anonymous #3 4w

Work in progress

0

Anonymous #1 4w

what makes you so certain the U.S. and Israel are going to “free” the people of Iran and not simply install a Western-friendly government that’s unpopular with the Iranian people?

5

Anonymous #3 4w

“Western-friendly” implies the abolition of an autocratic regime

0

Anonymous #1 4w

not necessarily, the U.S. has installed Western-friendly dictators before like the Shah in Iran, Armas in Guatemala, Diem in South Vietnam, Soko in Congo, Branco in Brazil, Suharto in Indonesia, Banzer in Bolivia, Pinochet in Chile, the military coup in Argentina, Habre in Chad, Batista in Cuba, the Somozas in Nicaragua, Balaguer in the Dominican Republic, Rhee and Chung-hee and Doo-hwan in South Korea, etc.

6

Anonymous #3 4w

Fair response. However, something that stood out to me was Trump's specific call to action yesterday. “When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take.” Does not seem like Trump will be jumpy to fill the leadership vacuum.

1

Anonymous #3 4w

Plus, the White Revolution policies under the Shah were objectively good and well favored outside of Islamic extremists. He was generally thought of as a benevolent dictator. But luckily, it doesn't seem we will go that route. This was covert CIA action in the past lol

1

Anonymous #1 4w

if anything I’d say that’s a bad thing, a power vacuum could simply lead to Khamenei’s successor or a military dictator

3

Anonymous #1 4w

if you call severe authoritarian repression, corruption, extreme inequality, and the brutal suppression of dissent by the SAVAK secret police “benevolent” sure, the economic growth greatly benefitted the elites but many average Iranians saw high inflation and rising poverty rates, the SAVAK were known both for torturing prisoners and arbitrary arrests

2

Anonymous #4 4w

bc it’s very unlikely for Israeli or American bombs to hit a school /s

37

Anonymous #3 4w

Same with Iranian gov /s

-1

Anonymous #4 4w

The bomb was either ours, the Israeli’s, or an anti air missile that went down. Still our fault all 3 ways

18

Anonymous #4 4w

Iran wouldn’t even have had to fire a missile in their case if we hadn’t started it, this is primarily the U.S. and Israel’s fault

7

Anonymous #3 4w

True, he had an iron grip on political life, but he also advanced literacy, women's rights, and the economy (high inflation but extremely high annual GDP growth, industrial modernization, poverty rates were actually declining, per capita rates tripled, I believe, and the middle class was basically reformed). The IRGC is worse on nearly every single objective metric.

-1

Anonymous OP 4w

It is fully possible that it was Iran’s, who were actively launching missiles and counter strikes. It’s not uncommon for misfires/tech failures to lead to missiles hitting the wrong target. Let’s wait to point fingers until there’s an investigation. It’s weird to automatically blame the U.S. because Iran said so

-1

Anonymous #4 4w

the war was started by Israel and the U.S. tho, no strikes by them = no bombs near schools whether they’re Iranian or Israeli or American

8

Anonymous #3 4w

This is a horrid, horrid childish position. You are now justifying the worst atrocities in history, as every side in a war believes they were the ones “provoked.” The War of the Cities (Iran-Iraq War) is a perfect example of how this logic completely fails

4

Anonymous #1 4w

Get better bait

12

Anonymous #1 4w

poverty rates increased, most of the per capita gains went to societal elites, and he was a repressive dictator The U.S. overthrew a democratically-elected leader to install him simply bc Iran chose to nationalize their oil

6

Anonymous #1 4w

dawg I’m not tryna justify the atrocity if Iran did it accidentally, but the idea that Iran started this is based on fantasy

1

Anonymous #1 4w

and legally Israel and the U.S. provoked Iran, this isn’t even an argument

1

Anonymous #2 3w

You are just choosing to believe these things out of your hate for Trump tho, there is a high chance that Iran bombed them themselves either bc 1. Because they suck and have no skill, and 2. They did it on purpose b. They don’t care about ANY life and know it would get people to turn on the US if we all spread for sure that the U.S. did it. Let’s find out the facts, Iran is the last news source you want to trust

0