Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 1d
Why does Hitler get more hate than Mao Zedong genuine question
comment

16
upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 23h

Because the history textbooks only ever focused on world war 2 and his crimes against the Jews. Literally no other group he went after was in the textbooks back in my Texas high school

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 21h

Because Hitler was a racist demagogue who led the intentional mass extermination of multiple ethnic groups in the most well-organized industrial genocide in human history. We went to war against him. Most of the deaths under Mao were due to incompetence.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 17h

Hitler’s evil led to the worst conflict in human history and the largest genocide, marked by the sheer methodical, industrialized nature of the slaughter. Mao, while still an unbelievably evil human being, had his crimes primarily limited to China, with a significant portion of deaths occurring due to his own stupidity, not pure evil intent

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Thats a question that the answer will both get downvoted to oblivion and also too long too type out in a chat

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 21h

Like yeah of course people are going to focus on the guy who did the Holocaust more????

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 21h

Mao (and Xi today) are literally doing the exact same things in East Turkestan

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 20h

The Uyghurs are subject to forced assimilation as a form of cultural genocide. Like what America or Canada did to indigenous peoples in the 1900s. Jews were mass murdered. It does not have the same methods, goals, or scale. To compare a mass internment and assimilation campaign impacting to the largest industrial genocide in human history is misleading at best, and at worst is obfuscating the true monstrousness of the Holocaust.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 20h

You are also bringing up shit the modern Chinese government is doing in a conversation about Mao.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 19h

6 million vs 60 million

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

Acting like that’s all who Hitler got killed. Yeah you’re definitely one of THOSE types. You weren’t looking for a real answer.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 18h

Wdym those types

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 18h

I looked it up and it says estimated 20 million. Still substantially less than Mao Zedong

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 18h

Have you perhaps considered that intentional eradication of millions of people based on ethnicity is different from having stupid agricultural policy that leads to famine? Also 60 million is the maximum of the estimated death toll. You’ve been using the max toll for Mao but minimizing the deaths under Hitler as much as possible.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 18h

You’re one of those types who minimizes the death toll of fascism while using the maximum possible death tolls under communism, because you are more sympathetic to fascism than communism.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 17h

you said it beautifully. Cultural and linguistic genocide is still genocide, but not the same level as genocide. There is a debate to be had about if the term genocide lowers the global importance of mass murders and similar that dont fit the criteria of genocide, but that is to be had after these liberals understand the difference between types of genocide.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 15h

To be clear the Uyghur language is all over in Xinjiang, it’s an official language of the region

upvote 4 downvote