
Ok I will gladly side with you agaisnt anyone who hates that korra is a woman with dark skin but that is not why I dislike the show, I disliked it because I felt korra was just not interesting and made a lot of dumb decisions and I didn’t like how it made aang seem like an absent father, or how a lot of the humor turned into something way more childish. I do think it’s over-hated but it had some genuine issues.
LoK seemed really cool, but it was also a big departure from the spirit of ATLA that I loved so much. Korra was always turning to institutions of violence to solve her problems, and saw the Avatar’s role as an arbiter over those institutions rather than a force for actual justice and liberation. Maybe it gets better later on, but it just stank of neolib propaganda and I couldn’t stomach it. It’s been a while though maybe I’ll give it another shot at some point.
Yeah I thought korra played with some interesting concepts but it really didn’t follow through with some of the ideological conflicts it set up (like the equalist movement or the ethnic conflicts of the water tribes). It just kinda went “well big guy is dead so it’s all fixed now.” I did think exploring the implications of bending in a modernized setting was cool at least. But like you just can’t match the original it was inaccurate
korra not being as interesting is kinda what im saying, like she is just sort of a random person that is the avatar and wants to help. for a show, it gets things to happen, but its not as interesting as someone like aang, an airbender who is this weird dichotomy between a detached from the material world monk and a kid who just wants to have fun. i think contrasting to most people, i dont mind what they did with aangs later life, it makes sense to me
aang being a partially absent father kinda works because he is the last of a race thats been genocided, so his focus being raising tenzin, the only kid who could airbend, makes sense. and the way the rest of it plays out also seems like a reasonable domino fall. the humor did get more childish, but one of my big gripes is the lack of an iroh figure. atla had a bunch, but tlok had to go back to iroh to get a single one. i just finished season 2 so maybe theres more, but that whole piece is missin
bad at her job at being the avatar also doesnt really upset me because... well everyone kinda sucked. kuruk was a bum, kyoshi... caused some lasting issues but nothing that much, roku was a bum who didnt even say he did anything, aang was the standout, and korra just didnt have much to go off
i mean she didnt start the equalist war herself, that was independent. but even with the issues and shortcomings, i dont mind that. its cool that aang got what he wanted at the end of atla, but having an avatar with shortcomings isnt a bad thing. i actually see that as kind of redeeming for tlok, though i wish the way things like raava played out differently.
you did also remind me of one of my biggest gripes of the show though: the bending. the setting being like 1920s makes sense for this to happen, but it also ends up feeling a little lazy. in atla, it felt like bending was an art form, which it kinda was. when avatar wan was learning the elements, learning the dragon dance, it felt like everything was an art. tlok lost that, and even if setting-wise its appropriate, it sucks that not even korra got it. like zuko vs azula was a dance