Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

Mind you, the way these people see it, the shooter was still a white man lmfao

8

Anonymous OP 11w

Holy shit, I hadn’t even thought about that.

7

you don’t see any problems with that?

3

It isn't worth mentioning at all because it has zero relevance to what they did or why they did it. they're pointing out the double standard. the same thing happens with the way the media sensationalizes crimes committed by black men vs crimes committed by white men in which their race often isn't mentioned.

7

Anonymous OP 11w

Well said. Thank you!

4

So you don’t mind if breaking news is filled with non relevant information? That seems a bit counterintuitive.

4

Why would the shooter being trans be relevant?

4

“We can always tell” style argument

4

Gender Identity is not a “general description.” The correct and obvious answer is that the shooters identity is being weaponized to demonize the trans community while simultaneously deflecting from the fact that they were also a neo-nazi gun enthusiast. You’re being coy. We know what you are.

2

Playing stupid isn’t cute bitch. You’re an insufferable person.

5

Then WTF is the logic behind having the word “transgender” being the first word in a headline about a shooting?

1

If you ignore the point again, yeah. Answer the question or stop wasting my time.

1

What was “transgender” the first word? I didn’t ask that before

4

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

Why was*

5

That is literally what they are doing. 🫩 It’s an entire thread on the X home page dedicated to people (including Elon Musk, the dude who runs the app) discussing the shooters gender identity and the “innate link between transgender ideology and violence.” I suggest you stop here because you just look fucking dumb dude 😭

2

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 11w

I’m starting to make bad typos, I need to get more sleep soon.

5