I disagree. There's a difference between conquering land during a time of wide spread colonization and being given land for "free" while kicking out and killing the people that lived there in modern day.
4
Anonymous37w
Let’s hold these standards for everyone. countries should not exist, if this is in fact your definition.
3
Anonymous37w
Yes
3
Anonymous37w
Based
3
Anonymous37w
did u think we were gonna disagree 😭
1
Anonymous37w
You’re an idiot
0
Anonymous37w
Suck my jewish ass. Both Israel and Palestine have the right to exist
0
🦧
Anonymous#437w
most people do disagree
0
Anonymous_orangutan37w
well that’s kind of an indicator of where we are as a society. Of course the US should not exist, that’s like the whole point of the country
-1
Anonymous#537w
China with its years of war, Japan, both Koreas, all of Europe.
2
Anonymous#537w
Should also not exist
3
🦧
Anonymous#537w
no. colonial entities should not exist. countries are going to exist simply because people exist
-2
Anonymous_orangutan37w
Should Mongolia exist with its past through the mongols and their raids of (g)rape and murder, your argument that “colonial entities should not exist “ holds no weight.
3
🦧
Anonymous#537w
does the mongolian empire still exist?
-1
🦧
Anonymous_orangutan37w
(no, the mongolian empire does not still exist)
-1
Anonymous_orangutan37w
No, but the history hasn’t changed it’s the same group of people
3
Anonymous_orangutan37w
Would it be ethical for the Chinese to take them over, since they had a history of crimes against humanity?
3
🦧
Anonymous#537w
keep making your false equivalencies
-1
Anonymous_orangutan37w
I’m asking a simple question. You can have your false narrative that it’s only wrong since it happened in the last 300 years.
3
Anonymous_orangutan37w
You are so stupid
6
Anonymous#1037w
do you not understand what happened ti the Native Americans?