Anonymous #2 11w

Literally gave a man a plea deal that resulted in bro only serving a few weeks in jail for years of sexual abuse.

1

Anonymous #3 11w

There was a hung jury and the victim wouldn’t testify again. The realistic options were A.) offer a plea deal B.) risk him walking completely free with no jail time

0

Anonymous #3 11w

Theres a huge difference between a pardon and the reality of the situation

0

Anonymous #2 11w

The deal proposed 1 day of jail time, of which the Judge lengthened it to 30. This alongside other cases of notoriety during Paxtons term have been looked at with plenty of scrutiny. Didn’t even make the man register as a sex offender fam. Get a grip.

1

Anonymous #3 11w

It was pretty clear to the prosecutors that if they tried to offer an appropriately harsh sentence, it would go to retrial and he would have walked away scot free.

0

Anonymous #2 11w

Pretty sure that’s undeterminable now that the offender has been set free regardless. This is an obvious miscarriage of justice overseen by Ken Paxton’s prosecutors.

1