
It’s perfectly okay to not want to live in a dense urban area, but rural (and suburbs of large cities) lack resource. Usually, community structure tends to do alright from an interpersonal perspective; less residents/properties = less money for local infrastructure and development = less job opportunities, lower availability or selection in schools, shops, housing, etc etc. I like the joke that old people miss college so much because it was, at its core, a walkable community
Yes thats why we do small scale projects like protected bike lanes which oftentimes we have to drag carbrains into as well. But yes, in the abstract many people will vote for more rail or transit but while it is being constructed or planned it will be stopped because people are like “why isn’t it happening yet” or “this is blocking traffic” or whagever
For sure. But I mean even bike lanes need to earn their keep. People who grew up getting around in cars need time to realize that biking to work on quality infrastructure isn’t only doable but actually quite enjoyable and convenient. I work in civil engineering and you wouldn’t believe how mad people get about these types of projects before they see they benefits for themselves
Sort of a cultural thing too, lots of American ‘carbrains’ as you say are just ideologically opposed to collaborating in any way, they like to think of themselves as rugged individuals even if their transportation systems make no sense and make their lives worse. They’ll come around eventually lol