Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Republicans who claim that it’s not that job of the government to care for its citizens via welfare programs: is this what the governments money is supposed to be used for? $11.3 billion in 7 days to fund a needless war and American deaths?
upvote 9 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Niether are examples of true conservative fiscal policy. But your phrasing is kind of off, social welfare in the United States has went to far, but it isn’t beneficial to get rid of it all together

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I was more referencing the sentiment I’ve heard from republicans rather than the actual policies. I would respectfully disagree with u tho, I don’t think welfare has gone far enough. Yes it could be improved, but it could still do more overall. Universal healthcare to start with

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

We can have some universal healthcare, especially for serious emergency situations. But we also do not need to pay for a 30 year old, able bodied, ‘looking for work’ status person’s housing for 10 years straight. It’s give and take

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I would again disagree. I think anyone, of all ages and physical shape, deserves universal healthcare. We can afford it

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

The government is supposed to secure the safety of the American people, idk how this is not achieving that in a meaningful way

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

In the US, we already spend about 60% of our taxxes on entitlement programs like social security, SNAP, disability, etc… A close relative of ours, Canada, spends about 40% of their taxpayer money on healthcare (mostly universal healthcare right) so it would be tough, many countries that have these healthcare systems still rely on the US for military protection and US consumers aswell

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

While I agree with you healthcare would be nice, that 60% number is ridiculous for not having it currently

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

And then theres me, I get no entitlement whatsoever, but when I got my bonus at work last week 34% of it was taken by the government. Healthcare would be something I could actually use I agree, but damn that money is just better spent paying for healthcare myself at this point.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

These are good points, I would argue that a tax increase on the ultra wealthy would be required then. Also, you could eliminate dense insurance bureaucracy and save money as well. This is something the Trump administration could have done rather than cancel a bunch of foreign aid grants, though actually doing a comprehensive review of those would save money as well for us to spend here

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Not only a tax increase on wages but also on investments. They can afford to give that money

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Of course setting up universal healthcare should be gradual, maybe over 10 years, but this all still applies

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Back to my original point too: we could save a TON of money if we weren’t spending nearly $1 billion a day on unneeded foreign wars

upvote 1 downvote