
just_a_bucket
Pineapple on pizza is a Canadian war crime and Canada should be invaded and all its provinces (except the territories) turn into cancerous square statesyes, that’s ethnic cleansing. does the recognition of indigenous nations mean ethnic cleansing to you? i say europeans should resettle bc that’s what whites would do anyway. the privileges and ethno-supremacist policies are dissolved and whites leave. this is called white flight
whiteness is dynamic? usually participation and support for colonialism and white supremacy is what determines if someone is white. you for example, are white. europeans in diaspora do not have to continue to adhere to an identity that strips them of their culture and their history
what europeans did, was sail across the ocean, enslave the indigenous peoples, Africans, the Irish, and other nonwhite peoples, enacted genocidal policies towards various groups of nonwhite peoples, and still claim that their nations are legitimate whilst not deviating in the slightest from their violent and bloody histories, and while arming the best documented ethnic cleansing in human history
but it’s problematic when i, a european stranded beyond europe, propose that the other europeans also stranded beyond their continent reflect on their history and identity and consider moving off of the land their ancestors stole by rape and murder? that means white genocide to you?
whites would not be ethnically cleansed if indigenous nations were recognized, this is the logic zionists use to justify a two-state solution. much like a singular Palestinian state does not mean Jewish genocide, indigenous sovereignty in the occupied Americas likewise would not result in the genocide if the settler class. what i am proposing is a voluntary pan-european movement that this moron is too willingly incompetent to understand
I mean you advocated for the return of all white people to Europe which I’d assume would be through some sort of coercion or force? Like I’m all for empowering marginalized communities but committing actual war crimes on a massive scale to get to that point defeats the purpose of creating a safer more just world
they are not going to commit the crimes perpetrated against them, they just want their fucking land that our nation has stolen from them. it’s sorta the bare minimum, given that we purged most of them into nonexistence. it’s also a crucial climate policy, seeing as we inventoried our remaining old growth forests under biden, for the to be logged under trump. indigenous peoples protect land, white people exploit it
genocide is a stretch, Britain cared more about adhering to laissez-faire economics than exterminating the Irish population, the government even provided (albeit limited and nowhere near enough) support through food aid it was incompetent economists not deliberately planned extermination
I think it’s more similar to like the Holodomor in Ukraine, in a genocide like Rwanda the state is actively rounding up and exterminating people, people died because the state refused to act effectively rather than state actively exterminating them, it’s a crime against humanity, it’s administrative mass murder, but not genocide bc it was caused by inaction rather than continued action to exterminate
It only appears vague because the enlightenment philosophy is backwards and 1 dimensional. That being said, I’m not selfish enough to share my opinion despite knowing nobody wants to hear it (most of the time). You also know nobody wants to hear your opinion, but you’re too selfish to stop yourself from sharing it anyways