Anonymous #1 18h

No I’m someone with common sense that if there are more barriers to prevent illegals from voting, we should take them.

-1

Anonymous OP 18h

If it’s not a problem why are y’all so scared. If it won’t do anything how can it hurt?

-1

Anonymous OP 18h

because what you’re advocating for disenfranchises eligible citizens, and you know that, but you don’t give a fuck. that’s why you made a second post after getting ridiculed in the first one. you’re a joke, and an idiot ;)

7

Anonymous OP 18h

Because it’s an unnecessary waste of time, money, and will only lead to racist harassment

4

Anonymous #1 18h

here’s the same thing I said in your other post.

1

Anonymous OP 18h

People are worried because there’s like what, 1 documented case of a non citizen being registered to vote? This means that the current system is working as intended. Any additional restrictions at best are gonna save 1 vote. At worse, they’re going to cancel thousands if not millions of legitimate votes

3

Anonymous #2 18h

Ahhhh is we are suddenly fiscally conservative, huh?

-1

Anonymous #1 18h

First off not even me secondly I ain’t reading your word salad little bro

-1

Anonymous OP 18h

A country is its people and as soon as you start diluting their ability to choose their own government, you are a traitor.

-1

Anonymous OP 18h

sure it wasn’t, just happened to regurgitate the exact same talking points word for word right? utter imbecile. don’t worry though, we know reading isn’t your strong suit. those comments are meant to discredit your talking points for others, because we all know you aren’t willing to put an effort into educating yourself (or, even worse, you aren’t capable of it)

1

Anonymous #3 18h

You’re right there are a few convicted cases of catching illegals voting. Of course this doesn’t consider all the illegals that weren’t caught, especially in blue states where there was little to no supervision. In fact in Cali, they’re not allowed to look at your ID. Why would they do that?

-1

Anonymous OP 18h

you are the traitor in question, you imbecilic fascist. attempting to attack our electoral process in an attempt to disenfranchise eligible voters as a means of securing more political power and security, is treason by definition. you skinheads are too stupid to comprehend anything aside from your hatred though.

1

Anonymous #1 18h

Common sense dude. If it looks similar, maybe just maybe it’s freaking common sense

-1

Anonymous OP 18h

you do not have common sense, you dumbass. why are the stupidest people in society acting as if they’re somehow not utter idiots? (I’m talking about you if you aren’t capable of understanding that)

5

Anonymous OP 18h

And I’m sorry I’m a fascist because I want a more secure democracy? And what do you think will happen to the voting power of the people in this country today if we continue to let in millions of illegal immigrants and then give them the ability to vote?

-1

Anonymous OP 18h

you’re a fascist because you’re attacking the electoral system and the right of your fellow citizen to vote while trying to hide it under the guise of “wanting a more secure democracy”, meanwhile you never put any effort into actually educating yourself about the state of democracy we live under and the threats it suffers from, and consistently ignore or disregard every single person who tries to educate you in why what you’re advocating for is dangerous and harmful.

1

Anonymous #1 18h

Bro, read a freaking book or article and I’m not just talking about the title. You literally formed your opinions from freaking social media. You’re the freaking uneducated one. Live in the world world and get off Yik Yak little bro.

-1

Anonymous #1 18h

you’re quite literally too stupid to effectively run the propaganda you’re trying to run, you dumb fuck. AND you sit there perpetuating utter disinformation, and you know it’s fucking lies. noncitizens are not voting, nor are they capable of registering to vote; the immensely rare instances of that happening are caught under the traditional post-election analyses for electoral fraud. you are the problem, and you’re actively making life worse for others.

2

Anonymous OP 18h

all you’re capable of doing is projecting your own insecurities. you’re a clown, and you’re a fucking idiot. maybe when you pull your head out of trumps ass, you’ll realize how utterly uneducated you are, and how manipulated you’ve been; until then though, stop acting like you give a fuck about “democracy” or electoral fraud. utter clown, and a piece of shit given what you’re advocating for.

5

Anonymous #1 18h

Bro, chill out LMAO. By the way, who said I was ever a fan of Trump he’s way too liberal and an idiot.

-1

Anonymous OP 17h

so you think that the fascist and white supremacist that is Donald Trump is “too liberal” for your liking? that proves my point that you’re a fascist you stupid fuck. did you think that being one of those inbred neonazi nick fuentes bootlickers was going to help your case? like I said, you’re a fucking imbecile and actively ruining the lives of those around you. you and others like you are the primary problem in our society.

0

Anonymous OP 17h

no one you want to target the electoral system, the fascist infighting isn’t going in your favor huh?

0

Anonymous #1 17h

Sorry, I don’t fit in your box bro. I think we should have social services to encourage middle class citizens to be able to have kids and pay for their education. But I also believe in a semi free economy. I believe a nation is it’s people and it’s the government’s job to protect and keep them healthy at all cost and all these foreign wars and social bullshit is a distraction.

0

Anonymous #1 17h

Not even a coherent sentence

0

Anonymous OP 17h

you fit *precisely* in that box, you dumb fuck. you’re quite literally too stupid to recognize how you’re shooting yourself in the foot. Also, “to encourage middle class citizens” is fucking laughable. social services is meant for all citizens, not just “middle class” ones. interesting that you felt the need to explicitly advocate for services only for the middle class though, while disregarding the entirely of the working class who doesn’t fit into that “middle class”.

1

Anonymous OP 17h

no wonder* I apologize about the spelling error, but I’m more sorry for your lack of reading comprehension.

1

Anonymous OP 17h

By the way, the working class is meant to be in the middle class you entitled prick

1

Anonymous OP 17h

I grew up under the freaking welfare system. I see how it makes desperate people reliant. And by the way, a standardized, federal education would help the poor and middle classes more than anybody else.

1

Anonymous OP 17h

dipshit, take a second and think about that statement you utter moron. if anything, *you* are the entitled one here for assuming as much. 1. is the entire working class isolated to the middle class, or are there working class people across the entirety of the wealth spectrum? 2. even if your bullshit assumption is correct, who would the “lower class” consist of then? if the working class only exists within the “middle class”, who rests beneath that middle class?

1

Anonymous #1 17h

furthermore, why would you still disregard that lower class as they inherently have a higher need for social services than anyone else?

1

Anonymous OP 17h

you’re not the only one, and a major critique of our current “welfare system” is that it was intentionally designed to prevent people from rising out of poverty, but maintaining it. that does nothing to address the topic at hand, which itself was a deflection from the original topic of the topic of elections.

1

Anonymous #1 17h

I’m not saying discount all social services for those in poverty just for those who refused to work and he live off the system instead of using it as a way to get back on their feet. When I speak of benefits, though such as reducing taxes for women who have children, I think they should only be for middle class as a way to encourage a large population of strong educated citizens. When you extend the same benefit benefits to those

1

Anonymous OP 17h

…In poverty, even if just temporary, they tend to get trapped and stuck inside of a vicious cycle

1

Anonymous OP 17h

And yeah, we did get way off-topic

1

Anonymous OP 17h

but why should they only be for the middle class? what studies do you have that support your claim that providing benefits contribute to the loop of poverty? what if I told you that poverty itself was that vicious cycle, not the social services. the lack of financial stability can dictate one’s entire life, even long after they escape poverty / achieve financial security. if I’m being honest, this topic specifically (the whole social services for middle class, etc) feels like a

1

Anonymous #1 17h

little bit of a misunderstanding of poverty itself if that makes sense.

1

Anonymous #1 17h

(which is understandable though given how complex of a topic it is; it takes a lot of time to research and learn about this stuff yk. the only reason I was coming at you earlier for being “stupid”, is partially because of how arrogant you were in claiming that what you believed was 100% factual no matter what; but ultimately all this takes is the humility to acknowledge that we all have the ability to be wrong at times, and the will to want to know when we’re wrong, and to understand why)

1