Anonymous #1 9w

That I’m not qualified at all to determine what should happen

6

Anonymous OP 9w

that’s not what anyone is asked to decide. it’s whether you believe she is guilty based on what’s been presented

0

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #1 9w

Ok and I’m saying I haven’t been keeping up with all that’s been presented and I haven’t had the laws in this scenario explained to me so I’m not qualified to make that judgement

1

i’m sure i don’t want to know but what is a mother strangling her 3 children a distraction for?

0

Anonymous OP 9w

So you're against the concept of a jury trial, which has been enshrined in our beautiful courts for centuries?

0

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #3 9w

considering how this one is going? and the hung ass jury i was a part of last year? yes. i am against jury trials for 90% of cases. we do not need to try a dude committing a crime on camera or a woman who plainly admitted to a triple premeditated homicide

-1

this only works as “totally not a coincidence” if you believe it was set up. this is a front page trial no matter what time of year

-1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

once again, a mother strangling her 3 children is front page no matter what else might be going on. 9/12 could happen and they’d still put this trial in the corner of the front page. maybe you don’t think it’s a huge deal but the avg american would think it’s a fake story if you told them it rn bc it’s so absurd

0

you assume juries correctly convict. you already have admitted she needs out of society at a minimum. there is nothing more to discuss on that. remove her

-1

Comment Deleted

0

it’s an acceptable alternative.

-1

Anonymous #3 9w

I never said that bro lmao it’s just that I’m not on the jury so it hasn’t been my duty to know all the details of this and I don’t. The jurors are better fit to make the decision

4