Lindsey Clancey should be free because there is no ROI on keeping her imprisoned. Who is she a threat to? She already killed her kids there's nobody else
Regardless by killing her offspring and incapacitating herself she has removed her genes. A noble eugenical sacrifice
4
Anonymous9w
Please Google Constance Fisher. She drowned her 3 kids, was found insane and sent to a mental hospital, was released and had 3 more kids and did it again. So unless you’re suggesting Lindsay should be forcibly sterilized, she shouldn’t be released.
4
Anonymous9w
What if she had more kids
1
Anonymous9w
OJ only has one life
0
Anonymous#19w
Then she has a moral imperative to kill them to stop her genes from continuing
2
Anonymousdickcheneyfan129w
What if she gives birth to a 25 year old man who immediately starts impregnating lots of women (consensually of course) but also fakes his identity with each one so it can never be traced back to him
-1
Anonymous#19w
Luckily Clancey kills them beforehand. Unless she miraculously births a fully grown 25 year old the child would be dead (best option) or severely maladjusted murderer/rapist. This hypothetical could never happen
1
Anonymousdickcheneyfan129w
Idk man all the technology these days ya know about it
-1
Anonymous#29w
your anecdotal evidence doesn’t mean shit
1
Anonymous#39w
A Lindsay Clancy defender talking about anecdotal evidence lmao
0
Anonymous#29w
So basically she self eliminated her genes from being spread. Hero