Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
If the 2A was more based 🙏
49 upvotes, 8 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "If the 2A was more based 🙏"
upvote 49 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Disgusting. OP has to be ugly

upvote -3 downvote
💡
Anonymous 2w

The 2A can’t get more based

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

The right to an abortion is not a fundamental right. The state has a very strong interest in preserving human life which already fails the strict scrutiny requires to pass what’s called the Glucksberg Test (which decides if a right is fundamental). And therefore, a non-fundamental right is subject to regulation and limitations.

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

As controversial as it may be, Roe V. Wade should never have been passed n the first place. Even Justices Gins Berg (May she rest in piece) and Sotomayor said that it was obsolete almost a year after it was decided.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Peace*

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Down vote me all you want. It’s a simple fact of the law. The right to medial procedure for non-life threatening situations, are not a fundamental right nor a constitutional right.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Rightoids are so stupid 🤭

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

If that’s so stupid, then why does the Supreme Court uphold that position? Even the dissents (the disagreements), said that Roe V. Wade needed to be overturned, just not how it was done in Dobbs V. Jackson.

upvote -1 downvote