Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Do you think fatphobia should be treated at as seriously as topics like Racism, Misogyny, Homophobia, and Transphobia?
#poll
Yes
No
70 votes
upvote 7 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

It’s something worth discussing and it’s a problem but it’s not the same kind of problem as those other ones nor is it of the same severity generally speaking. The others are unchangeable characteristics whose persecution is solely rooted in bigotry.

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Voting yes bc all should be treated equally unseriously

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

damn this poll did not turn out how I assumed it would

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Can the people voting “no” elaborate?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Is fatphobia not rooted in bigotry as well? Literally hating on someone because of their appearance and your assumptions about their health is wild

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Generally speaking we don’t want people to be overweight. That’s something we do want to societally minimize. People who are overweight shouldn’t be treated badly, but it’s still a national health concern. We should not, meanwhile, socially minimize the population of minorities or women or trans people or gay people.

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Insulting someone based on an inherent, unchangeable feature (race, sex, etc.) is a completely different issue than making fun of someone for a situation which they got themselves into, and have the capacity to fix

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

There is bigotry to a degree. Someone being overweight doesn’t mean they are a bad person for instance. But there’s also a large health component to it, which is not a motivating factor in bigotries that focus on inherent unchanging characteristics like the others.

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

weight can be a immutable attribute of someone especially women bc of ✨hormones✨ a lot of women cannot physically lose weight no matter what because our hormones play a huge role. we could eat borderline starvation diets and still not lose anything.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

also all the illnesses that have been falsely connected to obesity (due to medical fatphobia) has been debunked by unbiased and fat friendly researchers.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

I think insulting someone based on any characteristics, immutable or mutable, is bad actually. And I’ve heard it’s pretty hard to lose weight if you have PCOS

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Are you implying that bigotry towards obese people is motivated by a concern for public health?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

If you intake less calories than your body burns in a day, your body will burn fat to make up the deficit. This isn’t exactly arguable. Sure, hormones fuck with your metabolism and make it *harder* for some people, but “cannot physically lose weight” is the biggest lie and I see it all too often

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Are you saying that for every single disease where obesity is a risk factor, that’s not actually the case?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

the human body is an open system. thermodynamics does not apply here because i can tell that’s where you’re going. we are not simple machines, we are complex biological systems. hormones override thermodynamics because of us being an open system.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

yes it has all been debunked by better developed and unbiased studies

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

So you actually just typed “hormones override thermodynamics” and then decided to click post?

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

I’m saying that that is a partial motivation. It’s not the only motivation. There is a lot of stuff which is just unfair. Disgust, perception of laziness, degrees of racism and sexism, and a lot of societal beauty standards. If it was just about public health concern, we wouldn’t be encouraging women to be super skinny, which can be just as unhealthy as being obese. But there is a legitimate public health reason to want to reduce overweight. There is not for these other bigotries.

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Can you show the study that disproves any link between obesity and type 2 diabetes?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Using words like “all” is really fucking up your credibility here

post
upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Ah ok I see where you’re coming from. I think most of the insults do come from simple malice though, not any concern for public health

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w
post
upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Is there a reason you cropped the rest?

post
upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Yeah. Like even if being overweight is unhealthy and often preventable (for the record I am a slightly overweight man), that doesn’t justify treating someone badly for it. Like we don’t treat someone who got skin cancer from not wearing sun protection with malice and vehemence.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

💀 lmfao

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

And part of this is also changing societal perceptions towards a reasonable healthy perspective. Because we right now are not encouraging people to be a healthy weight, we are expecting someone to be unhealthily underweight. Some fat is normal. And we don’t adequately talk about how unhealthy being super underweight is or how unhealthy bodybuilders often are.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

this same study says obesity ≠ fatty liver. the two can exist independently of each other

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

If your point is that there’s more to obesity than just BMI, then I agree, BMI is a very flawed metric. But generally, I think it’s fair to say that obesity can contribute to T2D

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Of course. I don’t think anyone is saying that they always go hand in hand. But obesity is a risk factor for these other diseases (like fatty liver disease, but genetics or high blood triglycerides can also contribute)

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

no i don’t regard it like the other forms of discrimination because it objectively doesn’t have the same past and present severity in impact

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Literally just stop expecting the world to change for you. If you’re saying being fat just happens to occur naturally completely outside of food intake you’re wrong. This is why people don’t take it seriously because you REFUSE to take responsibility for your current state of being.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

well that’s also not true bc there are medical reasons people gain a lot of weight not due to food intake

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

Matter cannot be created or destroyed. You don’t just magically create hundreds of pounds of fat out of thin air. It has everything to do with food intake.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

When you say food intake, are you including conditions like Prater-Willi syndrome, where it’s so difficult to stop eating that people literally have to lock up their food? It’s much harder to control your food intake when you produce much more ghrelin (the hormone that signals hunger), it doesn’t drop after eating, and an issue in your hypothalamus means you don’t ever register feeling “full”

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Brother I highly doubt ALL these people have an extremely rare genetic disorder. Bringing up extremely niche circumstances is not helping your case at all.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

I didn’t say they all did. I’m just wondering if that’s included when people say “food intake”. Brain injuries can affect this part of the brain too, and those are way more common

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

I’m not really making much of a case besides “insulting or discriminating against people based on various physical characteristics, immutable or mutable, is bad”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

well yeah if you literally don’t eat anything you’d be dead but many disorders cause weight gain not related to excessive calorie intake but things like slow metabolism, water retention, fat redistribution, and insulin resistance

upvote 1 downvote