Anonymous #2 2w

And his employers :)

31

Anonymous #3 2w

Listen if he’s happy to say all these things and do them great!! His advisors and employees can hear it too :)

27

Anonymous OP 2w

I say go for it

17

Anonymous OP 2w

👀 don’t be shy

9

Anonymous #8 2w

It would have nothing to do with it if TPUSA was non partisan and if members currently weren’t being outed for things like this nationwide

9

Anonymous OP 2w

There are plenty of members who are just normal human beings that lean right wing. This is far from a right wing issue. Again, there are extremists in every group. That doesn’t mean every person is an extremist.

-2

Anonymous #8 2w

Does endorsing nazism happen more on the far right or left?

6

Anonymous OP 2w

It depends. Both are rooted in authoritarianism and can carry Nazi beliefs. I’ve had the unfortunate experience of talking to Neo-Nazis who were leftists. Also, you’ve taken the argument from left and right wing to FAR left and FAR right, which is a different thing entirely. TPUSA is a very moderate and basic right-leaning group. There will always be hidden crazies like how we have literal pedophiles walking around us everyday, but a lot of TPUSA members are just average joe college students.

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

The titles of “extreme” and “far right” fit people like Nick Fuentes, Alex Jones and many more notorious names.

4

Anonymous #8 2w

You can claim it’s different entirely it’s not. TPUSA is not moderate, its CEO called for public executions and perpetuated far right propaganda.

7

Anonymous #8 2w

Which side; you dint answer

4

Anonymous OP 2w

Both.

4

Anonymous OP 2w

TPUSA members are not copy and paste Charlie Kirk. That’s not how it works.

2

Anonymous #8 2w

I said which one does it more, both isn’t a viable answer when there’s a qualifier of “more”

3

Anonymous #8 2w

You’re claiming it’s moderate; I’m saying it’s not and the foundation of the org is based off a perpetuation of far right ideals. He’s just the example since he was the CEO

2

Anonymous OP 2w

I wouldn’t know, because they BOTH have people that would qualify as Nazis. I don’t know every single person who is a Nazi, just that both sides are capable.

1

Anonymous #8 2w

Infer then. I’m not asking you to make an accurate statement, I’m asking you to predict based off the neo nazis today and their audiences and how they tend to lean politically (right or left)

2

Anonymous #8 2w

TPUSA is a fascist organization, Charlie Kirk was a white supremacist. The only difference between him and Nick Fuentes is that Kirk was a bit more polite and kept things vague.

10

Anonymous #8 2w

TPUSA are a white supremacist group… and what the fuck do you mean “leftist neo-nazi”, words have meanings. Nazi doesn’t just mean, “person I don’t like”

15

Anonymous #9 2w

Leftists can follow Nazi principles too, but naturally, they’d be in denial.

-3

Anonymous #9 2w

Everything is fascist when you’re a leftist, because you’re already on the extreme end yourself lol Charlie Kirk doesn’t speak for all TPUSA members or all right wingers. Most right wingers aren’t far-right, just average joes 😂

-3

Anonymous #9 2w

Also, I know TPUSA members, even some who aren’t white. They’re not white supremacists. Again, Charlie Kirk is Charlie Kirk, everyone else is their own person. They’re looking for a place to have civil discourse and peaceful interactions so our country doesn’t fall apart from division. And god forbid they try to create community on campus, especially for students who don’t consider themselves left-wing

-3

Anonymous #8 2w

They’re white supremacists. You can be non-white and still be desperate to align yourself with whiteness to the extent that you’d support white supremacy.

4

Anonymous #8 2w

Y’all aren’t be persecuted just because your receive criticism from others. If you wanna be a political group people will criticize your politics & ideologies. If you can’t handle being called a white supremacist, don’t make it your brand to have ass takes on politics that promote white supremacy & christian nationalism.

7

Anonymous #8 2w

Civil discourse? They’re violent extremists. TPUSA chapters across the country invite open neo nazis as guest speakers. They’re essentially our modern Hitler Youth

8

Anonymous #4 2w

The chapter at my campus promotes very basic things, so I don’t know which white supremacists and Christian nationalists you’re talking about. You might just be projecting viral clips of Charlie Kirk onto every person in the org. Of course, people will criticize, which isn’t the problem. The problem is assuming the opinions of people you don’t know. Politics is very nuanced. I’m a right winger and am more freedom loving than the Republican Party claims to be, which is why I’m an independent.

-2

Anonymous #4 2w

(2) Plenty of right wingers and even Christians aren’t like these viral videos. I know it’s hard to separate. We see that with the trans community and plenty of other groups of people having the whole group attacked because of the actions of the extremists. It wouldn’t be fair to judge everyone on actions they didn’t commit.

-1

Anonymous #9 2w

Which Neo Nazis? 🤔 Each chapter has different leadership too. The folks at my uni are really nice and peaceful. I doubt they’d invite anyone who isn’t beneficial for discussion.

-1

Anonymous #8 2w

You didn’t answer. Try again

3

Anonymous OP 2w

I’d say it probably exists a little more among the viral right wingers like Nick Fuentes, but it barely swings that way due to it being closely equal. Also, this was a delayed message, because I have things going on in life. I don’t check YikYak regularly.

-4

Anonymous #8 2w

So you can infer! How peculiar it took you multiple hours! Why would you say that?

1

Anonymous OP 2w

…again, I have a life. I had things to do that did not require being on my phone responding to someone lumping people like myself and those I care about into extremist categories. I say it’s fairly equal, because it’s assumed someone far left is incapable of being a fascist when this isn’t true at all. Something they and the far right can align on is authoritarianism, that being where the government has a strong control over its people, but the kicker about the far right is that I would (1)

0

Anonymous #8 2w

You having a life doesn’t change the fact that you intentionally chose not to answer the question but still engage for HOURS with someone else. Why do you think it exists in the right, more?

1

Anonymous #8 2w

Hm. This post and that group chat that got outed for anti Black and Jewish hatred are not making the most convincing argument for you. 💀 Those are the people you side with if you’re a republican.

8

Anonymous OP 2w

(2) infer that there are more libertarians classed as far right than there are libertarians classed as far left. That’s because libertarian socialism, which is the left’s equivalent of a right wing libertarian, still involves government control which is just a coping mechanism at that point for wanting a strong central government but also hating it at the same time. It doesn’t work, and that’s why leftists typically don’t refer to themselves as libertarians.

0

Anonymous #10 2w

I’m not a Republican. This is the problem with America. It’s either Democrat or Republican. I’m a right winger who also is disappointed with the Republican Party, but TPUSA or not, I’m going to be lumped in with viral ridiculous people like Fuentes. It’s literally lose lose in politics these days 💀

-1

Anonymous #8 2w

So you think it’s because of arbitrary classing self imposed by libertarians?

6

Anonymous OP 2w

I already responded, and I took a few minutes to respond to another person because I already had been talking to you.

1

Anonymous #8 2w

No you had initially said both to “who does it more” which you can admit is not a sound response to who does something MORE

1

Anonymous OP 2w

Neo-nazism, fascism with another name and perhaps a few add-ons which is arguable, is an authoritarian ideology, something that is possible both on the left and right. Difference is that far right people can be classed as libertarians, far right but not at all endorsing authoritarianism. A different flavor of extreme but usually not in a bad way.

-1

Anonymous #8 2w

I said “IF you’re a republican,” dumbass. If the shoe fits, wear it. Defensiveness is your default emotion for some reason.

9

Anonymous OP 2w

I try to avoid having someone limit my responses to a one word response, because it doesn’t allow freedom for elaboration. It’s just a really crappy debate mechanism that’s become more popular to try and speak for the person or strawman. I wanted to say my piece before the rest so we could have a real convo about it and not a “gotcha!” based off an overly simplified response.

0

Anonymous #10 2w

It’s the context of the conversation. I was simply pointing out that I’m not a Republican, which is a common misconception when someone hears right-wing.

1

Anonymous #8 2w

That still doesn’t address my comment. There’s a clear venn diagram between nazis/racists and “right wingers” i.e. republicans. I was referring to the fact that the group chat that was leaked not long ago in addition to this post does not paint a pretty picture for the morals republicans have. That’s all.

5

Anonymous #8 2w

You’re pretending I forced you into a one word response when all I did in reality was force you to tell me who you believed did it more. YOU gave the one word respond of “both”

3

Anonymous OP 2w

I didn’t want to just say that so I didn’t, but you asked me again and I said both and started reiterating and then, since you really didn’t want me to say both I said it barely leans right.

2

Anonymous #8 2w

You gave me a one word answer, I never put that qualifier on. I asked you an extremely valid question that you chose to answer like that. Why are you now saying you don’t like giving one word answers

3

Anonymous OP 2w

I gave a one word answer after I gave an elaborate one and then, you told me that wasn’t a valid answer and that I have to pick one. Anyway, I’m heading off. This is getting to be a broken record and I have things to accomplish.

0

Anonymous #8 2w

You think it’s valid to be asked a one or the other question and you reply with both? You truly believe that’s rational?

1

Anonymous #8 2w

“neo nazism is possible on both sides” lmao you literally don’t know what any words you use mean do you? far right libertarians aren’t bad? their entire ideology was artificially manufactured so that billionaires could rape the global south harder (and so that those billionaires could rape literally kids)

9