Anonymous #2 1w

These guys have horrible typing skills

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Aside from being Epstein’s executor of his estate that’s not the point, I’m assuming you can read the top line?

1

Anonymous OP 1w

The “Trump boys” could be any number of people, from trumps own children, people on trumps campaign (December 2016 btw), financial donors of his, etc. Not saying it’s definitely not suspicious, but it’s a massive leap to assume that it is

5

Anonymous #1 1w

No matter who it is it should be investigated. Especially considering trumps claim he disowned Epstein in 2007. Letting your kids or associates hang out with someone you disowned doesn’t sound like he’s telling the truth. Completely dismissing this because it isn’t directly saying “Donald Trump committed crimes” is absurd on its face

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Dismissing evidence because it is circumstantial at best is one of the major fundamentals of our legal system, for better or worse

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Good thing this is the court of public opinion and not an actual court. That means these people should be questioned until the truth is found either in legal court or through public admission. Again, dismissing this because it isn’t 100% clear is ridiculous

1

Anonymous OP 1w

You realize that the precedent you want to set would give this administration power to search your all your communications for vaguely worded criticisms of Trump right? Again, yeah, definitely worth looking into. That’s what good detective work does which we definitely lack. But automatically assuming it’s something nefarious is the dangerous mindset here.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

I would just like to see actual negative consequences for those that willingly associated with Epstein. Whoever the “Trump boys” are they are clearly associated with both Trump and Epstein, and seeing as Trump is currently our president I would just like some answers on who exactly was in Palm Beach on Christmas right after the 2016 election

1

Anonymous #2 1w

=A0 is HTML or Unicode for “.” I’m not sure what language it is specifically but other versions of this document show “.” where =A0 appears

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Occam’s razor would suggest trumps children or close associates

2