Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Saying Israel is causing people to be more antisemitic is like saying “what was she wearing” when someone gets 🍇
upvote 15 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

I mean if you look at the history it very clearly has. That doesn’t mean it’s justified, any form of racism is not justified. But when a country constantly does war crimes and then goes “our actions are the actions of all Jewish people” it’s gonna have some predictable results.

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

I bet this thought process goes hard for people who don’t know anything about Israel

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Frankly I suspect to a degree it’s intentional, as a method to make the diaspora feel more unsafe so they to come to Israel. Seeing Israeli officials go “YOU HAVE TO FLEE FROM NEW YORK CITY RIGHT NOW AND COME TO ISRAEL” right after mamdani was elected contributes to this feeling.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

No I’m just a nerd for Jewish diasporic history and the history of Zionism. Y’all always seem to stop talking to me as soon as it’s clear I actually know what I’m talking about and my opinions on Israel are informed by a strong love for Jewish culture and a knowledge of the history of Israel itself.

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Are we talking ancient Jerusalem? That was built by Jews certainly. During the Bar Kochba Revolt, the city was almost entirely razed and its Jewish population was massacred or expelled, and Jerusalem was replaced with the pagan settlement of Aelia Capitolina. Following Constantine it was then Christianized. Jews were not allowed back in Jerusalem until 638, when it was captured by Muslims and Caliph Omar allowed Jews to once again live in the city and access the Temple Mount.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

The post-Hellenic history of the Levant is very complex and modern narratives tend to intentionally leave out how many religious groups were involved. Samaritans in particular tend to be ignored in modern narratives. The genetics though are pretty clear. The actual genetic composition of the Levant hasn’t changed that much. Modern Palestinian communities are primarily the descendants of local Jews, Samaritans, and Canaanites who converted to Christianity, and most then to Islam

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Most modern people completely misunderstand the population dynamics of Arabic conquest and cultural expansion. It’s not a replacement of people groups, not like English colonization of Australia or North America. It’s local people adopting Arabic language, religion, and culture. Pretty similar to how Roman colonization worked.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

The state of Israel LITERALLY insists that they represent the Jewish people as a race and that anyone who condemns their atrocities are engaged in antisemitism. That itself is an antisemitic ideology that Israel demands the world adhere to.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

No the Romans took Hasmonean Judea from the Selucids, and then later destroyed Jewish society as punishment for revolts. The Muslims arrived in a land which had already been overwhelmingly Christianized (the Byzantine atrocities during the Samaritan revolts are an important event). Most of the Christian population (as well as many Jews and Samaritans) then converted to Islam.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

I am not antisemitic, I’m literally here CONDEMNING the antisemitism perpetrated by the Israeli government. I’m an ally of the Jewish people, always have been always will be. Why do you keep attacking my character and saying I’m a Nazi?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Palestinians are indigenous. They are the local people who never left, but converted to another religion and adopted another language. The Irish did not stop being indigenous after they adopted Catholicism and later the English language.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

The concept of “indigeneity” is one that only exists in contrast to a colonizing force. During the Hellenistic and Roman eras, Jews were indeed the indigenous inhabitants being subjugated by Roman and Greek officials, soldiers, and settlers. However, over the last century, Palestinians are the indigenous population being subjugated and displaced by Jewish colonists.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Historically, Greeks in Anatolia were an indigenous population that were being subjugated by Turks. However, if Greece was somehow able to launch a conquest of Turkey and replaced Turks with Greek settlers, those Turks would be the indigenous population being replaced by Greek colonists, despite Anatolia being historically Greek prior to Islam.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

And early Zionists acknowledged that Palestinians were native and they were a colonizing force. I suggest you take a look at the essay “Iron Wall” by Ze'ev Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism. He repeatedly refers to Palestinian Arabs as “natives” and compares them to the Sioux and Aztecs. To quote him directly: “Zionist colonisation must either stop, or else proceed regardless of the native population.”

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

I see that my “you’re gonna disappear when I show that I know what I’m talking about” prediction holds true.

upvote 4 downvote