Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
there’s way too many people that are certain dems will control the house next year.
7 upvotes, 15 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "there’s way too many people that are certain dems will control the house next year."
upvote 7 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

At this rate we’re never getting a national ban on gerrymandering

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

the dems need to position themselves where a median iowan would be a dem voter. maybe be left on economical issues and more moderate on social issues.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

I’d feel better if the DSA wasn’t turning off swing voters. Now we have republicans vs two democratic parties that are cannibalizing each other.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

yes you’ve cracked it. Fucking DSA is the problem, not the geriatric center dem leadership that is wholly unable to see that their neglect/disregard for young people makes them disillusioned.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 8w

Yes the DSA is the problem. Their policies are trash - abolishing prisons? No more senate? No more independent Supreme Court? If you can’t see why normal people don’t like that, you’re gonna be extra confused when democrats don’t win as much as they should during midterms.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

DSA have 120k members nationwide, and you think they’re relevant to the DNC’s failures? holy shit you’re stupid.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 8w

With several elections being decided within ~120K votes, I think #2 has a very valid argument

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

That’s for the whole country. And I’m sure there’s absolutely no DSA members who still vote blue after the primary, those definitely don’t exist. fucking idiots man.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 8w

You’d be surprised

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

Aw, can’t mane areal argument? Ultimately the whole model for the political process is that people/parties present their ideas, and voters have free choice. If DNC really thought DSA was that impactful they could form a coalition and collaborate with other voices.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 8w

*make

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 8w

You’re overestimating how many DSA members will never vote Democrat. If you were here during the last election many leftists refused to vote for Harris because she wasn’t as hard on Israel as the DSA. Many people will outright not vote if the DSA isn’t on the ballot, which is where the risk is. These people don’t understand the concept of voting for the lesser of two bad things. The decrease in popular vote between Biden and Harris supports this, although there’s lots of reasons behind turnout.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Source? or just proof by assertion?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

they’re sick of being TOLD that’s what they need to do. they’re sick of being told “her you NEED to vote for me to keep the evil guy out, right?” because that’s infantilizing and then pretends a better option is worse than their DSA opposition… take the Michigan democratic primary debate the other night, for example! Stevens kept just saying her intention was to simply beat the GOP candidate. we need more expectations for their actual time in office and answering the people’s wants/needs.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

They tried that in ‘24 and it didn’t work for shit. why advocate for rerunning a strategy/platform that’s been demonstrated to be ineffective?

upvote 1 downvote