Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Progressives have to use facts and reason to make our points while conservatives appeal to emotion and use common falsehoods. One is a lot harder than the other.
This post is unavailable
upvote 20 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

The party of facts and reason when you ask them why that “woman” has a penis:🫪

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

1. The Democratic Party isn’t progressive 2. Women can have penises? That’s not the own you think it is.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

What is a woman

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

What is a chair?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

What do you think it is?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Holy non sequitur

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

How?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

I asked you to define something directly concerning your inane claim and you asked me what a chair is. Your “well, like definitions are relative man” schtick really isn’t an own

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

A woman is someone who fits the complex social category of “woman” it’s very complicated and I don’t fully understand it because the social complexities of gender isn’t really my specialty.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

I’m trying to prove that definitions can be complicated and many things are defined more by social understandings than by dictionary definitions. I’d love to talk about the complexities of gender and what a woman is but something tells me you don’t want to have that conversation. If you do, than I was wrong and would be more than happy to discuss it.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Well what is the “complex social category of ‘woman’”? We have a clear delineation of sex, being chromosomes. Yes, there are abnormalities and outliers, but that occurs is every aspect of life. If we don’t live in a society where we can use definitions, we can’t function as a society at all

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

I’m curious as to why you think we need simple definitions for everything. What would be the negative consequences if we accept the complexity of the world?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

I’m genuinely wondering by the way, I always thought of it as conservative and I want to get your perspective.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Because you need to be able to discuss things at a base level and have delineators. If we don’t define what a woman is, we can’t define a woman’s restroom, sports, health care products or bodily functions. You can have a baseline definition of a woman and acknowledge outliers. A chair isn’t at risk of its spaces being infiltrated by other inanimate objects, women are at that risk

upvote 1 downvote