Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
How did people actually vote for this?
upvote 16 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

People fell for MAGA’s crap again

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

How are people opposed to this? Like, I get it—you can hate Trump all you want—but let’s not pretend like the mullahs are good people either. Stoning women, executing protestors, and sewing terror throughout the Middle East. Practically the entire region wanted this because as MBS of all people correctly pointed out, the Ayatollah was quite literally akin to Hitler. Now, you might argue the war is illegal under “intentional law,” but what good did that do Ukraine when Russia invaded?

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

tribalism is a powerful drug

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

That’s the cool thing, they didn’t! They just gaslight themselves now into thinking they did the whole time. Watch

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

why are you guys acting like this is the apocalypse

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Misinformation

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Why are you okay with what’s happening?

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Probably because it’s a net positive for the world

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

“I was for this all along actually guys”

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

BULL. SHIT.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

Would you be saying this if Kamala Harris was president and bombed Iran? Fuck no you would not.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

because iran needs to fall

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

calling an illegal war a net positive is only possible when you completely ignore every single person living in blast radius lol they used this logic to justify Vietnam and Iraq, the net result is just losses in life and global stability

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Why? Favorite politician said so? Have some thoughts of your own bro

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

i hate trump and i hate iran

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

You would be just as livid if a democrat did this don’t lie to yourself

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

The people of Iran can do that themselves. We’re done overthrowing regimes every time Israel wants us to put Americans on the line.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

We all know that if anyone but him did this you’d be wanting a coup attempt here

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

saying iran needs to fall as a justification for bombing them is just putting the government’s crimes on the people, the current regime is a brutal, patriarchal autoracy that has murdered thousands of its own people, but failure imposed from the outside isn’t an actual solution, we’re just adding flames to the fire

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 3w

they actually can’t

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

So who’s gonna do it then you? Get off your armchair and pick up a rifle big man

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

this doesn’t help, it just lets the government label protestors wanting democracy as Israeli spies or CIA agents and disappear all of them also our sanctions destroyed the Iranian middle class, usually the people that lead revolutions

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Yes I would

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

That’s unfortunately not our problem. Look how our operations in Syria and Afghanistan went

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 3w

All war is illegal, and I stand firm in the belief that deposing a regime that seeks only to oppose not just us our allies, but us directly, is a good thing. Iraq is in a much better state now than it ever was under Saddam, idk if that’s fair to say. Vietnam I would agree with

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

I actually voted for her

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 3w

What do you think we’re trying to do? Do you think the years of sanctions has just been for fun?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

It lowkey seems like it, because nothing good has come from it. The best thing we had was the 2016 nuclear deal. We could have worked from there

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

Yeah after a million dead people, the rise of ISIS, and destroying most Iraqi infrastructure we liberated them lmfao In 1953 the CIA led a coup of Iranian’s democracy, we sanction them massively, why would they ally with us? This doesn’t make the world safer, it just tells our enemies to get nuclear weapons as fast as possible. Plus you oppose Vietnam but are using the same logic used to justify it lol

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

International law is effectively just a euphemism for American foreign policy at the end of the day because we’re the only ones that actually bother to enforce it. Ultimately, it’s just the law of the jungle. So knowing that, are you really gonna sit back and let the Iranian regime commit all kinds of atrocities and obtain nuclear weapons in the name of upholding “international law”? Can you see how that’s not only moral cowardice, but also directly precipitates bad outcomes?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

Finally someone with a brain, almost gave up hope there

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

i agree with everything you said about iran and i have been wanting someone to take out the regime for a while, but i think Trump and Netanyahu are the worst possible leaders to entrust this to. they are so caught up in their own selfish interests that they went into this with no plan for what comes next which means there’s no guarantee things will get better. the next guy in power could be just like the last

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 3w

It seems almost certain that things will get better. Even if some hardliner takes charge, what are they gonna have to work with? They’ll have no nukes, no ballistic missiles, and no military to speak of. Hell, we’re even targeting the secret police now, so it seems unlikely such a figure would even be able to maintain a grip on power. All that to say: we can pretty much only go up from here…

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

I really hope you’re right

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

They already didn’t have nukes. We’re attacking their border force too and it looks like we’re trying to get the Kurds to take over

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

And then the Kurds and the Balochis demand independence and then Sunni jihadists from ISIS and co take turf and then sectarian war starts between like 5 different factions there is so much that can go wrong and has before every other place we did this

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Don forget Turkey has a problem with the Kurds

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

But even all that would be infinitely preferable to our current situation. If Iran is ever allowed to acquire nukes, everything changes in a way that really has no precedent in the history of the region. By contrast, sectarian war is pretty much just business as usual in the Middle East.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

We’ll be dropping bombs there for the next 15 years if that starts up and we’ll be putting in marines too. All to protect our buddies the Saudis and the Israelis

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

We also had a plan in place that prevented all this btw and allowed inspectors to come in, and sanctions were lifted. Thanks to Dogshitman we got rid of that so he could do this

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

That “plan” was the slow path to nuclear weapons. And do recall that we decimated ISIS without putting boots on the ground, so why should it be any different now?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

We had plenty of boots on the ground in fact we weren’t even withdrawing from Syria til this year, and that might not even happen anymore, thanks again Dogshitman

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

on what planet did we decimate ISIS with no boots in the ground 💀

upvote 5 downvote