Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 13w
Dismissing stats because the person who made the graph works for a “capitalist outlet” is lazy. At least evaluate the source of the underlying data. It’s giving “Wikipedia is unreliable because anyone can edit it”
comment

6
upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

Vagueposting goes hard

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

Generally if a source doesn’t show it’s methodology then it can be dismissed as dishonest at best

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 13w

If this seems vague to you, dw, it’s not for you. This is for the likes of orangutan, dumbegg, and Landtrust

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 13w

That’s what a vaguepost is. A post clearly directed at someone specific without actively saying it.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

The source is clearly linked to. The critic is simply lazy.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 13w

Isn’t that a subtweet?

upvote 1 downvote