US Politics on Sidechat | Dismissing stats because the person who made the graph works for a “capitalist outlet” is lazy. At least evaluate the source of the underlying data. It’s giving “Wikipedia is unreliable because anyone can edit it”

Join communities on Sidechat Download

Dismissing stats because the person who made the graph works for a “capitalist outlet” is lazy. At least evaluate the source of the underlying data. It’s giving “Wikipedia is unreliable because anyone can edit it”

6

14

Anonymous 2d

Vagueposting goes hard

5

Anonymous 2d

Generally if a source doesn’t show it’s methodology then it can be dismissed as dishonest at best

1

Anonymous

#1 2d

If this seems vague to you, dw, it’s not for you. This is for the likes of orangutan, dumbegg, and Landtrust

1

Anonymous

OP 2d

That’s what a vaguepost is. A post clearly directed at someone specific without actively saying it.

1

Anonymous

#2 2d

The source is clearly linked to. The critic is simply lazy.

1

Anonymous

#1 2d

Isn’t that a subtweet?

1