Anonymous #3 2w

i know he’s racist and no one wanted that just don’t expect us to be sad abt it

46

Anonymous #3 2w

1) he was racist. 2) he didn’t fucking deserve, we just don’t mourn him.

25

Anonymous #3 2w

Where was that said in here? Show me.

8

I don’t shed tears over Adolf Eichmann being hanged until dead. I’m still against the death penalty. Two things can be true.

10

I just simply don’t care about his death. Can you please understand that?

9

#1 tried for the gold medal in mental gymnastics, but broke their leg jumping to conclusions.

10

Wow, you’re funny. Do yourself a favor, don’t look into who commits the most amount of terror attacks.

21

we’re sympathetic to his family, to the ppl that witnessed it but not HIM we’re not happy that it happened, nor are we sad and that is totally ok. dont expect us to be mourning a man who’s made his whole career demonizing and disparaging marginalized communities.

32

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 2w

Pancake boy give it a rest you’ve been in this comment section for hours on end you should put the phone down

8

Anonymous #3 2w

1) I have notifications on, I do other stuff. 2) you are entirely correct on that last point.

8

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 2w

We ALL should actually

4

Or maybe it’s because he was a racist bigoted piece of shit who made a career off of harming people and so we’re not gonna waste time giving fake tears. Doesn’t mean I think he deserved it just means he was a piece of shit and I have better things to do with my time.

5

I don’t even watch the dude but checked a few videos. Not a bad guy at all. These people are just deranged lmao

-1

yeah because he fucking did dude… he was a neo nazi and supported pedophilia

1

Anonymous #7 2w

saying 10 year olds should give birth and that genocide is okay and that we should kill all gays is good is all fine? charlie kirk was a fascist.

2

Anonymous #12 2w

Don’t think he ever said that, but good for you

0

If that’s the message you’re getting i think it says more about your complexes

1

Anonymous #7 2w

He said that black women who get positions over white women weren’t actually qualified. He said that black people were better off enslaved. He said that he hated empathy. In what world was he not a bad guy when he was a bigot who used a platform to normalize racism and all other kinds of bigotry?

11

Anonymous #7 2w

He was literally asked if his 10 year old daughter had to carry a baby after she was raped would he let that happened. He said that he did have a daughter and answered the baby would be delivered. So yeah he did say 10 year olds should give birth.

8

Anonymous #7 2w

nahh you should look up some more bro was a putrid human being

1

Anonymous #3 2w

Btw this is misinformation his family wasn’t there

5

Anonymous OP 2w

Thats not the whole quote “I can't stand the word empathy, I think empathy is a made up new age term that— it does a lot of damage, but it's very effective when it comes to politics, sympathy I prefer over empathy but that's another topic for another time.". He then goes on to say later “sympathy is a better word because empathy means you are actually feeling what another person felt, and no one can feel what another person feels” .

4

Anonymous #15 2w

If you’re gonna quote him at least give the full context. Not understanding each other is why he got shot. If the shooter could’ve been sympathetic to his neighbors he wouldn’t have shot Kirk.

0

Anonymous #12 2w

He had 0 Nazi like or adjacent ideas. You need to stop calling people Nazi’s who aren’t. Because when a real Nazi finally shows their face and gains political ground, NO ONE will believe you or care. It’ll happen sooner than you think.

0

Anonymous #15 2w

I don’t think the full quote is any better lmao

18

Anonymous #16 2w

What’s wrong with it? It’s completely true. Nobody feels exactly what another person feels, you can only project your assumption and reaction onto that person. Secondly, it’s entirely possible to define a positive term such that it can’t apply to another group, and then conditioning people to use it as a way to give themselves moral high ground and denounce others. Can happen with any positive term really, it just ended up being empathy.

-2

Anonymous #7 2w

it’s kinda a self report if you say you can’t empathize only sympathize. You can see someone going through the same thing you did and you can recall that feeling, if you can’t then that’s on you 🤷. Like that quote further projects individualism that capitalism thrives off of bc you can further exploit the already secluded people if they’re not empathizing with others.

10

Anonymous #16 2w

No no. Sympathy exists fully as what we feel at others circumstances. We then try to project that onto others and that becomes empathy, which is basically just sympathy under the assumption you know exactly how it feels to be in that place, an assumption that is always false. Sympathy at least anyone can give in spite of whether or not they understand someone’s circumstance, which is arguably better. But go ahead and twist my words, I expect as much.

-1

Anonymous #16 2w

Charlie took the definition a little more exact than what most people did, and that’s why he’d say stuff like this, it’s fairly obvious that it’s just a difference in how you perceive the definition, charlie thought of it as “you can’t feel exactly what their feeling because the circumstances are not 100% the same.” For example, say we both lost our moms in a car wreck, the exact same scenario, Charlie thought “I can’t empathize with you because my feelings ab it aren’t the EXACT same as yours”

1

Anonymous #7 2w

Not twisting your words but aight.

1

Anonymous #16 2w

Yeah well yknow I have sympathy because I don’t believe I’ll know exactly how anyone feels about anything without applying myself to it. But of course tell me I’m incapable of doing something that you can’t do either. What you feel is called sympathy.

0

Anonymous #17 2w

They’re* before anyone gets on my ass

1

Anonymous #7 2w

Some people are incapable of empathy. I’m not trying to villainize you for that, like it’s ok to not be able to bc you can learn through reflection and/or therapy. But if you personally can’t empathize and then say “it doesn’t exist.” That’s a very very dangerous rhetoric to be spreading. You’re just using this conversation to victimize yourself and that’s very apparent.

1

Anonymous #16 2w

Tf you mean. I’m just thinking logically here. You don’t think I feel bad for people? I just know I can never know exactly what someone’s life is like and what they go through, which is why any feeling I would have even if you would attribute it to empathy is really just sympathy.

-2

Anonymous #7 2w

Bruh this is literally the most pointless semantics game you are playing for literally no reason other than to defend a guy who literally made a career out of normalizing treating people people he viewed as lesser be seen as lesser to a wider argument.

11

Anonymous #6 2w

Really? I never seen him treat anyone less than him. What are you pulling out of?

-3

Anonymous #15 2w

My man do you think there are no more living Nazis? Real ones continue to show their face and when people say hey that shits pretty similar to Nazi rhetoric you all just go “stop exaggerating” when you all can’t actually name substantial differences between the two. You need to stop sticking your head in the sand and excusing rhetoric and beliefs that yeah are pretty fucking similar to fucking Nazis. Hell you should examine why your more offended by the suggestion of someone being a Nazi than

1

Anonymous #15 2w

You are by Nazis themselves.

1

Anonymous #7 2w

Saying black people were better in slavery and reducing them to “prowling blacks” and saying that black women don’t have the brain processing power to be taken as seriously as white women and that the civil rights act was a mistake and that 10 year olds should have to give birth and that if he was flying under a black pilot he wouldn’t believe he was qualified are just a few examples.

12