
THIS. theres a house on my campus that was owned by a confederate general. you can see the slave quarters in the back. they havent taken it off the campus tour. like i wont lie its a beautiful old house. but uh? why are we spending 10 minutes talking ab the architecture when if u round the corner u can SEE the old wooden structures? like be so fr. if i was a man and could piss directly on it i would
That’s reasonable. You shouldn’t be putting yourself in harms way. My point is that you must engage with them in order to better know their arguments so that others don’t fall into their ideological traps. A good example I feel is the anti-trans rhetoric we’ve been seeing. You can’t ignore people like Joe Rogan or dipshits like him. Your goal is to sway others, not them.
oh i get that. but nah thats not the arguments being had around here fr. it sucks bc like ut austin is pretty selective. everyone is smart in their own ways but many people are stuck in those ways. which is why a bar a block away from campus hosted a pro israel event with israeli flag banners and such just last week and ppl were more pissed that we were pissed they did that then at the bar for allowing it.
like we have top notch profs, with educational and anecdotal experience. they dont wanna hear it. it goes to ad hominems always. so in my environment at least, its not like theres a lack of exposure or reading available. ppl are just convinced they know everything and dont care to hear a damn thing else. the slogan is ‘keep austin weird’ but its become ‘keep austin centrist’. bunch of yuppies and cosplayers this way
It’s definitely not easy, even from an argumentative standpoint. Persuasion usually feels more like a vibes thing than a factual thing anymore. Being right isn’t as appealing as being hot or cool sometimes 🤷♂️ With the Israeli stuff, you essentially have to hear the arguments, even if it’s just in an online format. Unless you’re protesting or something, don’t go into a group of people who wish to see you dead 🤦♂️
From a philosophical perspective, Rawls, John Stuart Mill, and Rousseau all had trouble figuring out “the fanatic”. I don’t know if those people fit into that, but it’s essentially “what do we do with intolerant or extremist actors in society?” I don’t think you’re wrong for not engaging. I would engage myself personally but again, those guys spent their entire lives trying to figure the problem out and got nowhere.
lmao dont bring up rousseauuuu ive had to read so much and was so frustrated w his writing by the end of the social contract and the origin or inequality. but i get what u mean. i just cant and wont do it. its important to educate ppl who maybe are in the pipeline but not all the way through, but the folks on the other end? nah. especially in texas? sb else will deal w them in due time