Anonymous #1 1w

I actually it’s what Hamas is doing. Israel is defending itself

-12

Anonymous OP 1w

wow so you’re just completely misinformed. you just have literally no idea what’s actually happening in the world do you. it’s like you dropped a toddler in front of a non-stop Haaretz feed

31

Anonymous OP 1w

Up is down and red is blue

12

Anonymous #3 1w

So Hamas has been launching bathtub rockets into Israel for 40 years, Israel works to remove terrorist from the West Bank, then Hamas attacks and murder thousands of Israeli civilians in 2023, and now Israeli actually invades to stop the killings. What am I “misunderstanding“

-7

Anonymous OP 1w

Why is it terrorism when Hamas targets civilians but not Israel?

23

Anonymous #3 1w

Haaretz is actually fairly critical of the war. This guy gets he’s news from the Times of Israel or Jerusalem Post or something like that.

16

Anonymous OP 1w

Israel has murdered 300,000+ civilians in Gaza.

14

Anonymous #2 1w

Bullshit. They’ve killed more people than Americans soldiers died in both world wars combined? Do you even listen to yourself?

-6

Anonymous OP 1w

It’s +73,000 Gazans and only 2,000 Israelis.

8

Anonymous OP 1w

Bullshit? They leveled nearly every structure in the entire enclave, held 2+ million people in artificial famine for months, and have prevented any access to medicine for 2 years. A substantial portion of the population (upwards of 10%) have been “missing” for multiple years at this point. Israel is a bloodthirsty terrorist state.

4

Anonymous OP 1w

Also to that comparison with WW2, yeah obviously? Not that many soldiers die in battle compared to how many civilians are killed when an army is intentionally attacking civilians. Most soldiers can barely shoot at the enemy.

4

Anonymous #2 1w

I think most soldiers died outside of warfare. Like illness, unsanitary conditions, exposure ect.

9

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

This is also true. Idk what his point is, like the Japanese murdered more people in the Nanking Massacre alone than the entirety of all US casualties, so yeah I think 2 years of bombing a tiny, dense urban environment could eclipse that number too.

5

Anonymous #2 1w

I looked it up, it was about 73,000 Gazan citizens and about 1,000 Israeli citizens

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Also ur example doesn’t rlly work, seeing that we were forcibly brought here…Gazan people weren’t forced into the Gaza Strip lmao

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

That’s Israel’s figure on the casualties, which hasn’t been updated in over a year. It’s based on the Gaza Health Ministry’s numbers, which haven’t been updated because the infrastructure to do so has ceased to exist, and which was always an undercount because it was entirely based on corpses brought to hospitals which in many cases never happened.

1

Anonymous #2 1w

It also doesn’t count starvation, disease etc.

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Oooh ok. That makes more sense. Gotcha

0

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

fyi Gazans were literally forced into the Gaza strip… a large majority of the population are the children or grandchildren of refugees of Israel’s ethnic cleansing

7

Anonymous #2 1w

I meant the area in general. Weren’t they already there prior to what’s known as Israel being given away?

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

It’s kind of a mess. I wasn’t trying to be combative, it’s just worth noting. We really don’t have good concrete numbers and won’t for a long time, but it’s safe to say the numbers are massive given the number of people reduced to nothing recognizable, or buried in the rubble, or who die of indirect consequence of 2 years of war and blockade etc. But even if it was 73,000 thats still an insane number

1

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

Oh well in that case yeah, thy weren’t forcible brought to Palestine because they’ve been there as long as Jewish people were. Though the strip specifically was basically the concentration camp they got pushed into over time.

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Yea ik they were forced into the strip itself. But I meant that entire area. So his analogy still falls flat

3

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

Off topic but I love uncle ruckus

-3

Anonymous OP 1w

Whenever someone says they love Uncle Ruckus or that he’s their favorite character I honestly side eye them. Why is Ruckus ur favorite character?

13

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

Funniest, and because he’s so funny he can say real shit people need to hear without them immediately getting their feefees hurt

-4

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

I think in their analogy the black people are supposed to represent Israelis?

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Hurr durr I think murdering medics and journalists is a good thing

5

Anonymous OP 1w

U realize Ruckus isn’t meant to be taken seriously right? He represents the self hating black man who’s wrong. Next time just say u think anti-black racism is funny.

11

Anonymous OP 1w

Uncle Ruckus is a great character BECAUSE he’s satirical in everything he does. He’s hilarious because of the ridiculous nature of his outlook. Media literacy should be better taught in schools ISTG.

6