?? No one is forcing you to be a nationalist just bc you were born somewhere

6

Anonymous OP 11w

Nobody's forcing you to be a globalist either

-2

Anonymous #2 11w

Oh god are you a Nazi

6

Anonymous OP 11w

No I'm a monarchist

-2

Comment Deleted

0

And most ppl don’t live in settler colonies. And taking pride in your country ≠ nationalism

1

Anonymous #3 11w

That is not nationalism friend

0

Anonymous OP 11w

That's a big stretch of the facts. The vast majority of countries' land claims were laid through conquest in a very similar manner to what we would now call settler colonialism.

-1

Anonymous #2 11w

Oh god here comes the colonial apolgia

3

Anonymous OP 11w

Colonialism can't be demonized under a globalist system without the recognition of a nation based hierarchy

-1

Anonymous #2 11w

I feel fine calling it bad because I am not beholden to the lack of a nation based hierarchy

0

Anonymous #2 11w

Holy larp

6

Anonymous discotheque 11w

Nope, lifelong terms and higher levels of power give you someone to keep accountable. In democracy a leader can (and very commonly does) blame the guy before them for any faults in their leadership.

-1

Anonymous #2 11w

As a result of this dynamic there is practically no incentive for a leader under democracy to care about the future of a nation, or even its current status, as long as these two factors do not interfere with their approval rating.

-1

Anonymous OP 11w

The post you are quoting was literally just talking about how Morocco has a friendly history with the USA

4

Anonymous #2 11w

I can comprehend how someone thinks this in a vacuum but not with the hundreds of years we can look back upon of monarchy being dogshit

3

Anonymous #3 11w

What was so dogshit about monarchy that we aren't experiencing right now in the US?

-1

Anonymous #2 11w

Yeah man Trump is acting like a monarch and that sucks. The answer is not to go all the way. Like please dude visit Bavaria and see all the bullshit King Ludwig II was doing. Or read about deadly succession war #3846. Or incompetent boy king #294. The literal point of a monarchy is that they are not chosen on merit and have little to no accountability to the people they govern.

4

Anonymous #3 11w

Neither of those ideas (minimal accountability + meritless election) are inherent to a monarchy, and they actually beautifully illustrate the current situation in the US. Thanks for hammering my point into the ground even further.

-1

Anonymous #2 11w

Yeah you’re a monarchist in the year 2026 idk why I thought logic or history would have any sway here

5

Anonymous #3 11w

Well, yeah. If you're unwilling to engage with your own logic further than a single comment, nothing will have a meaningful effect. We are currently experiencing minimal accountability and what I would argue to be elections that result in a meritless leader taking office from a democratic government, why should I think that these issues are inherent to monarchy?

-1

Anonymous #2 11w

Riiiiiiight. Man the internet is a wild fuckin place people just be saying anything

3

Anonymous #3 11w

Good job sticking it to me by engaging on a deep level with the logic and history LOL

1

Anonymous #3 11w

Btw have you heard of Hitler before? Seems like democracy has pretty big faults as well.

1

If you were given the perfect governance on a silver platter you would still reject it

-2

Comment Deleted

0

Heritage based is only good under specific circumstances

-1