Anonymous #1 3w

What

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

Ig you don’t know

13

Anonymous #1 3w

I’m not understanding how the reference fits this

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

It’s a bible reference

1

Anonymous landtrust 3w

I know what it is i just don’t understand how that relates to this

1

Anonymous #3 3w

That is not at all what the law is lol what

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Just false

1

Anonymous OP 3w

No it’s true, look up the legal definition of fighting words

1

Anonymous #3 3w

No way you just screenshotted the google ai answer lmaoo You can read the (probably wikipedia) article it’s referencing and see that calling someone the n word isn’t considered “fighting words” Fighting words is also not used to justify or nullify attempted murder Do your research

6

Anonymous OP 3w

I’m not justifying it, that doesn’t exonerate the stabber. It just lessens the charges. Why people can get out of crimes like this, because people pursue the maximum possible charge, whereas the safer charge is more likely to stick

1

Anonymous OP 3w

I’m talking like actual court room debate structure not the court of public opinion

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Like you know how in like every police show ever there’s an episode about a guy they wanna charge with murder but all they have evidence for is manslaughter, but the rookie protagonist is like “nah man I have a feeling” and does some sketchy shit that would get them fired if they’re wrong, but hey they’re right and they book him and it’s a big celebration for the new guy/gal? It’s like that

1

Anonymous #3 3w

It doesn’t lessen the charges because the precedent isn’t to consider that fighting words Read the article the AI is referencing it talks about it

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Facts don’t care about your feelings 🤡

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Also, debate aside, I somehow got ChatGPT to write the hard r???

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Now ask it if that justifies a stabbing Go ahead. Give it this exact case

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Of course it doesn’t justify a stabbing my guy I’m not saying it should

1

Anonymous OP 3w

All I’m saying is that in cases like these it changes the nature of an altercation from a premeditated attack to a reactionary response. It changes how it can be charged, and the jury/judge is responsible for determining if the case meets the criteria. Cases like these can make it much more difficult to prosecute. If done poorly, it could fail completely. See Lindsey halligans fruitless attempts to charge Leticia jones and James comey

1