Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

It depends on timing but I see Anti-Democratic Party posts from the left either doing really well or getting downvoted into oblivion. Either way, the usual suspects will always be out in droves defending them in the comments.

4

Anonymous #3 4w

Might the take be that democrats have a vested interest in ICE and actually don’t want to do better? Biden broke their funding records 2x during his term. Kamala promised to be tough on the border too. The difference is chiefly optics

18

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

I can’t speak to whether or not they want to do better, but they should

3

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Bc everyone is fine with immigration enforcement if you want immigration to be enforced differently then change the laws.

-3

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

And it’s reasonable to want border security, but what we’re seeing from ICE now is not that. Not even close

-1

Anonymous #3 4w

Why is this getting downvoted 😭 I’m not even complimenting Democrats here

3

Anonymous #3 4w

Bc it’s not criticism you’re not virtue signaling correctly. That’s the entire point of all of these post.

-2

Anonymous #3 4w

well i am complimenting but not letting them off the hook for their mistakes

3

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

No, these posts are rightly criticizing Dems, and they’ll need to improve going forward. Idk if they want to but they should

7

Anonymous #3 4w

See not your virtue signaling correctly lol.

-1

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

“I have issues with the hypocrisy of the blue half of the uniparty” blue__wave (without pausing to consider the irony): He MUST be virtue signaling

16

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

Who do I vote for to get immigration enforced differently? We’ve established both halves of the uniparty are ICE enjoyers.

11

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

I mean we can revisit our past convo if you want to talk about how you virtue signal lol.

-2

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

If you guys want to talk about specific things I’m fine with that but saying x should’ve done been or done better isn’t a criticism you can literally say that about anything.

-2

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

What’s crazy is that not a single exchange you’ve had w/ me on this app has ever stood out enough to warrant reexamination (to me at least) even once 😭

11

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

That’s the point of a primary dipshit. We don’t have a party for every new issue, that’s how democracy works if the public doesn’t broadly support your stance it doesn’t happen.

-2

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

“MOOOOOOM! They’re being mean to the politicians I like againnnnn!”

11

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

In all fairness there was no primary in ‘24, but that was for obvious, one-off reasons. I expect a contentious ‘28 democratic primary

8

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

Don’t worry guys, blue__wave says we can vote our way out of this! I feel better already

10

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Yes to you, that’s the entire point you’ll get bodied in a convo then you’ll be repeating the same stupid shit the next day. Remember when you said Obama was a war criminal then when I pushed you on it. you said actually you didn’t know if he was a war criminal or not you just thought he was bad.

-2

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

Ermmmm ackshually you just hemmed and hawed about whether Obama met the *technical definition* for a war criminal. The Libyans being held in open-air slave markets salute you for defending the president’s honor.

9

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

I’ve been “bodied” like twice here and neither of those times were you. I think you may have an inflated idea of your rhetorical power.

7

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Yes that’s how the law works if you don’t meet the definition then you aren’t guilty. I know you vibe your way through all of your opinions but you have to know how brain dead you sound when you say that.

-2

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

I’m so curious what those convos were lmao. Was it the convo we had when you said aid to Gaza was bad bc it was good optics for Biden lol?

-2

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

I don’t care if you’re mean to politicians I just want you to use your brain when you do it.

-2

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

That sounds very in character for me. I’m the type of guy who would withhold food from starving people if it made the democrats look 0.000001% worse.

10

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

More mad at me for calling out ur goat Obama than you are about him ordering extrajudicial bombings on civilian targets and American citizens 😭 But my brain is dead 💀

4

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

Oh buddy. You very clearly do care. This can’t be good for your blood pressure. (Sorry Orangutan and everyone else whose phones are going off crazy style rn)

15

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Yes you are brain dead. Bc anyone who knows anything about international law knows you can bomb civilians if you’re targeting a valid military target. If civilians dead = bad conflict then was world war 2 bad?

-2

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

You would unironically yes how did you vote in 2024?

-2

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

When did I say I didn’t care about politics I think it’s entertaining.

-2

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Bro orangutan has nothing better to do than smoke weed and jerk off thinking about ethnically cleansing white people they’re fine lmao.

-2

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

“It’s entertaining” = huge self report. You follow the news like it’s a show or something. We weren’t at war with those countries so again show me where those valid military targets were rofl. You just like playing world police and that’s ok—so do the dems. In ‘24 I voted locally and wrote Claudia/Karina for prez & VP.

14

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Did you mingle with other voters after your performance?

4

Anonymous #2 4w

Was right about the usual suspects

12

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

No I don’t think all politics are entertaining just stupid convos like this. Usually during that period we were at war with non government entities so it wouldn’t make sense to be at war with those countries, it depends what specially we’re talking about though. Yes I think that’s based being the world police. Yeah so you would 100% be fine with taking aid away if you got to virtue signal about it later.

-1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Also you don’t necessarily need a formal declaration of war for example in Libya, the example you gave. The UN had a resolution to intervene. Again you know nothing about any of the claims you make.

-1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

You just say random shit.

-2

Anonymous ___joker__ 4w

Yeah there was a charcuterie station and everything actually it was chill

6

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

It feels random *to you* because my politics are consistent. I don’t base good/bad on whether I like the party the candidate is from. Even if it was random, you’re an open US interventionism enjoyer which is more deeply embarrassing than anything I’ve said here ever.

9

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

I mean you’ve gotta be chill to be a communist. No point in getting angry when you know you’re going to lose every time.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 4w

Bro WE are losing. Regular people are losing

11

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

No it doesn’t feel random it is random, in one moment you’re talking about international law and then when you no nothing about international law you just appeal to you saying you feel like it’s wrong. That’s not being consistent that’s being a dipshit. You haven’t given any actual reasons beyond democrats = bad. I just want an actual reason.

-1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Pick one is it international law or do you feel like it’s morally wrong. Pick one then explain, I shouldn’t have to explain how to make a coherent point.

0

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Also are you not a U.S. intervention enjoyer? You think ALL U.S. intervention was bad including ww2?

0

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Easy there bud, you’re not on Twitter. You don’t gotta do your performance for me again. I know WE are losing, dawg. ✊ Class consciousness and shit

3

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

I think violating the rules of war IS morally wrong. It’s both. Is that starry-eyed idealism?

1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Ok that’s fine just give an example of one pls and explain why you think it’s morally wrong. Bc you don’t know anything about international you’ve literally explicitly said that to me at one point, which btw is fine just make moral claims then.

0

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Just give me a reason or an example.

1

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

I shouldn’t have to explain to you why bombing & destabilizing other countries is morally wrong. You just see those people as less important and less capable (hence your support for world-policing them). Peak American exceptionalism

1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

You think bombing Nazi Germany was wrong? I’m just asking you to justify your claims and you can’t. Ask me for an example of anything I talk about I can give you one. The truth is you don’t have good reasons to believe anything you do you unironically think democrat/U.S.= bad, that’s how deep your political beliefs go.

0

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

If it’s so obviously wrong then you shouldn’t be struggling this hard to give an example.

0

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

Yemeni wedding

1

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

Once saw orangutan cry about Dresden and then go on to quote Bomber Harris about killing Nazis and how based it was. Truly one of the funnier gaffs I saw from a commie on here.

3

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Ok perfect we’re actually getting somewhere. So from my reading it seems like the U.S. unofficially claimed there was al-Qaeda terrorist they were targeting at what third party sources said was a wedding procession, but nothing was conclusively proven beyond that. So what’s your conclusion from this event assuming it’s the one you’re talking about?

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 4w

I mean was it a gaff? I think they’re a weird ethnic nationalist they want all the white peoples to go back to Europe unironically.

1

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

I think it was around the time when Israel/Palestine had started to kick off. Everyone was crying about how Israel was “carpet bombing” and then he turns around and is like “erm actually the guy who popularized carpet bombing is based!”

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 4w

Yeah idk they have weed psychosis they’re either pro Stalin or pro ethnic nationalist depending on the day.

1

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

I find him funny. Kind of a big dumb oof in a way. Can’t stop smoking weed and perpetually makes moronic posts because of it. Master class individual

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 4w

Fr this is me and him

0

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

Jesters are funny *on purpose* though

3

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

True they’re funny on accident.

1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

How do you feel about their ethnic nationalism?

1

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

How do you feel about yours?

3

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Or, wait, you’ve just got regular nationalism going on. That is marginally better actually

4

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

What’s my nationalism? Yeah I agree it is better.

0

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

“I think it’s based being world police” = ultranationalism. Literally the Monroe doctrine again. You haven’t taken the time to actually explore the implications of your worldview

1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Instead of assuming what I mean by that why don’t you ask clarifying questions. Everything you believe would be much less shallow if you actually explored things instead of just assuming.

0

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

No assumptions are occurring. You can’t think that America ought to run the world and NOT think your country is better than the other ones at the same time. Cognitive dissonance going crazy rn

5

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

I don’t believe in the Monroe doctrine I don’t think I’ve ever even talked about that lol. Again it’s just another random thing that your brain invented lol.

0

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

Are you an LLM model designed to maximize frustration among the historically literate?

2

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

It depends what you mean by the “run the world” idk what we’re even disagreeing or what you’re prescribing to me. I think it’s good when countries in general enforce good international norms, I think the U.S. is in the best position to do that. I don’t think we should “run the world” or what that even means in this context lol.

1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

No you just say random shit that I don’t believe I’m sorry I’m not agreeing with things I don’t believe in lmao. You can’t prescribe me random beliefs I don’t hold then get “ frustrated” when I say I don’t believe in those things. What a weird thing to get mad at people about.

1

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

If your position is that we should impose “international norms” on countries we don’t like with military force, you are advocating for US hegemony.

6

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

No I’m saying I’m fine with countries in general enforcing norms not just the U.S., but I’m not inherently against U.S. hegemony but I would rather move away from U.S. hegemony into more of an international/ liberal framework. But that’s mot even what the Monroe doctrine is, I don’t think even know what that means lmao. The Monroe doctrine is when the U.S. claims that other countries can’t interfere in the Americas.

1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Which I’ve never made a claim about again it’s just something you invented in your head about me, either that or you didn’t know what it was, which is probably more likely lol.

1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

Also you’ve appealed to international norms multiple times just in this convo so idk why acting like you’re suddenly against that.

1

Anonymous boariskarloff 4w

When I talk to actual nationalist they call me a globalist, but I get nationalism is a loaded term that probably everyone on here probably has their own stupid definition for.

-1

Anonymous blue__wave 4w

“Why yes, I do reject protectionism and support globalism…why do you ask, Soy Wojack?”

5