
tbh i think you could make an argument that a lot of these religions originated from cultural contexts that didn’t have the concept of literalism that we have today. a lot of religions are more worried about their stories being remembered and retold than being explicitly believed if that makes sense
The Bible isn’t documented history lol. I agree with 1 in the sense of how OP’s responses are wrong, but let’s not act like the Bible is a history book. It’s stories relating to Christianity and some history retold through that lens, but at the end of the day it’s not objective; solely because something it listed in the Bible doesn’t mean that it had to have taken place at some point.
True it's not all objective, I was talking about moreso the New Testament and the life of Jesus. Even non Christian historians recognize that jesus existed, his ministry happened, and something weird happened after he was crucified to cause people to die for a cause. No comic book historian thinks spider man actually existed