Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download

justinian

Is there a sinister catch to this or are the wealthy starting to get concerned about the masses becoming modern day Jacobins over the cost of living?
I hope that “red tape” they’re cutting isn’t things like environmental impact studies, local traffic analyses, and heritage/historical preservation inspections
link

Senate passes bill to lower housing costs and restrict Wall Street from buying homes

www.nbcnews.com

upvote 4 downvote

🐺
Anonymous 20w

Let’s play a game. Does it: A) Pave the way for funding new construction (stocks in construction go brrr), B) Restrict who can buy houses (it’s not like corpos already bought them!), C) Reduces the reviewing process for acquiring houses (because surely that can’t be abused by anyone wink wink), Or D) Doesn’t allow other corporations to use the same exploits as before (because kicking the ladder for everyone still counts as equality) That’s right! The correct answer is actually all of those!

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 20w

They will not care until it is too late. This is the human cycle of empires.

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> sonofattila 20w

who does it restrict from buying houses?

upvote 6 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 20w

FDR probably knowingly prevented a communist or fascist revolution

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> justinian 20w

This is very true. Honestly one of the single greatest feats of government actually working for the people. The current one simply does not in its current form.

upvote 1 downvote
🐺
Anonymous replying to -> justinian 20w

Title X of the act has the exact details but essentially it is mostly against corporations. Trouble is that corporations already owning them can keep them for a period of up to 7 years, so it basically just keeps the winners winning — 7 years is more than enough to pivot AND profit

upvote 1 downvote