Anonymous #1 5w

If it has a freeway room for an intercity rail. And worse case scenario you do streetcars like basically every American city founded before 1900 had

-1

Anonymous OP 5w

you come up for the money for that then

1

Anonymous #1 5w

First of all, rail infrastructure is such an economic driver that cities should make it a top priority to come up with funding. Second they should be diverting road money. Cities are constantly spending soooo much money expanding their highways and roads which only creates more traffic. Trains reduce traffic

1

Anonymous OP 5w

first of all

4

Anonymous #1 5w

Excellent rebuttal 👍

1

Anonymous OP 5w

do you think i’m trying to have an argument or something, all i said was that some cities can’t afford to prioritize it. i’m not disagreeing that trains and shit are a good thing. it still make them a city, which is my point. it’s still a city

3