Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

A November report said that 25% of ICE arrests come from Texas and DeSantis claimed around 10k arrests in Florida since the beginning of “Operation Tidal Wave”. It’s not rocket science to understand that there will be less incidents of violence and news-worthy events when state and federal law enforcement are working in cooperation instead of against each other

2

Anonymous #3 2w

Bullshit. For 100,000 people? Not a math guy?

0

Anonymous #2 2w

^I’d love to see a source for this one 💀

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Florida Source: https://www.flgov.com/eog/news/press/2026/governor-ron-desantis-highlights-success-florida-federal-immigration-partnership Texas Source: https://www.texastribune.org/2025/11/03/texas-trump-immigration-crackdown-ice-arrests-deportation/ Keep listening to MSM man, they have your best interest at heart!

6

Anonymous #3 2w

Says the guy linking the Texas tribune and flgov 🤣 is that you Karoline???

0

Anonymous #2 2w

The real number is around 300k and that’s 32k that never appeared for their court date and 291k children that DHS never filed a court date for. They’re definitely unaccounted for, but it’s really unlikely that they’re actually missing and completely separate from the people who care about them

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

You called bullshit and are resorting to ad-hominem instead of trying to actually disprove what I said. Those are the most readily available sources, if they’re so wrong please show me. Balls in your court “cocksucker”

4

Anonymous #3 2w

Do you have a source for this?

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

But yeah I’d agree, immigrants who have been disappeared within ice custody is quite different from people that are out in the community but haven’t reported for a court date

1

Anonymous #3 2w

Bro you literally used “MSM” unironically. Why should anyone take you seriously at all? Why would anyone believe that you’re NOT swallowing the cum loads of the current admin by the oil tanker?

0

Anonymous #3 2w

Like with that comment, you just proved that you wouldn’t believe any source that you don’t readily agree with. You just gave away your own game, dumbfuck.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Making fun of a man for swallowing cum? That’s kinda homophobic 😬😬

6

Anonymous #3 2w

That isn’t going to work with me, my guy. You’re not going to appeal to an audience on something even you don’t believe lol

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

You always this charged up, or is it just when you’re confronted with facts that don’t completely fit your nihilistic worldview?

3

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

https://www.theyoungcenter.org/press-releases/young-center-fact-checks-vice-presidential-debate-claims-about-immigrant-children/

6

Anonymous #3 2w

Nihilistic? LOL. Nice projection, dumbfuck. Sick that you didn’t deny the MSM claim though. No one believes you and no one ever will lol.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I’m more focusing on your marginalized views of the LGBTQ community and how you use sexuality as an insult, that might be the real story here

4

Anonymous #3 2w

Thanks for sharing it 🙏 pretty unequivocally proves OP’s point to be wrong

4

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

No problem!

1

Anonymous #3 2w

Yeah? My “views on the lgbtq community” are the real story and not ICE, illegal immigration, or missing children? Lol. Smartest conservative dicksuck.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Dawg what’s wrong with the Texas tribune? Sloppily dismissing valid sources just makes the anti ice crowd look bad

9

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

Really? That’s what you’re worried about? Bro, you realize this guy doesn’t give a literal fuck about valid sources nor does anyone else? Everything is about optics now. No one reads shit, no one looks into shit, it’s all just TikTok videos and clowns like this linking sources while using the term “MSM”. It’s time to grow up a bit and realize the environment you’re in.

-1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I mean yeah? How do you know what this guy gives a fuck about? He provided both of us with sources and I actually looked at them and who funds their reporting. If you don’t actually care about the truth of what you’re saying then why say it?

3

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

“How do you know what this guy gives a fuck about” when he’s in a thread dropping the term “MSM”. Before you make any other comment about anything else, I need you to actually tell me WHAT YOU THINK he is inferring when he uses that term.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Ngl I don’t even know what that means 😅 what does it stand for?

4

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

Ohh is it mainstream media? Still I think you should actually look at the source and give a reason why you think it’s not reliable instead of just hurling ad hominems

5

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

MainStream Media. It’s code for “I don’t accept sources or believe anything is valid until it confirms my belief”. How the fuck are you going to argue you sources when you don’t even know the term MSM? Have you been living under a rock for the past 10 years? That was the entire “fake news” and “alternative facts” mantra.

0

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

Because it doesn’t maaaaaattttttterrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

0

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

Why do you think it fucking matters?!? The world you live in where you think if you just have the right source or the right amount of information that you’re going to all of sudden change this guys mind is an actual delusion. He doesn’t fucking care what source you give him. We could sit here for fucking hours and have this conversation and he won’t care 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Got damn bro I’ve just never seen the acronym chill out

6

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

I’m honestly confused what you’re even arguing for. That his sources are bad sources for some undisclosed reason but that nobody should care about any sources or facts in the first place anyway? Is that not pretty much exactly the goal of the trump admin?

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

I’ll give you a little bit of head start on another thread. The one with the ICE chief giving the salute…you know the exact playbook that they’ll give. He’s doing it right in front of your face and they’ll show you a picture of Cory Booker in a stilled image and say he’s a Nazi as well. So I’ll ask you, if you know that they’ll never accept what you’re saying, why keep playing the same game?

3

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

No, it’s that his sources being good or bad don’t fucking matter. That’s the argument. We’re beyond sourcing or having the “correct” argument. We’ve been beyond on that for quite some time and for whatever reason, people still keep trying to play this game around and around and around and around and around they gooooo every single time. Who are you looking to convince? The people who give a shit have their sides and the people who don’t give a shit can barely be considered conscious.

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I guess I just don’t enter conversations with the level of cynicism that you do. There’s a lot of factors making an ice agent a likely candidate to be a Nazi, far less to point to Corey booker being a Nazi. Additionally you can still research these things to determine which images are real and which aren’t. Is figuring out the truth so it can be discussed not useful for you?

5

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

Shitheads like this guy don’t need sources because they’ll always play the null argument aka “just because I don’t have sources doesn’t mean it’s not happening”. This guy is a walking projection talking about sources while using “MSM” before even linking them and then calling me nihilistic when we both know he doesn’t give a fuck about anything except for the things that confirm his world view. If it confirms it, it’s a good source, if it doesn’t, it’s MSM.

-1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

You seriously need to put down the phone man. I literally helped the person you’re responding to in disproving the OP. You have no idea who I am and your level of anger towards people who are generally agreeing with you is crazy. I’ve seen people with short fuses in this community, but you actually take the cake

0

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

No. It’s not tbh. “Truth” is an illusion. Again, you’re doing it right now. When have these dipshits ever said “well…maybe it’s a bit odd he did that salute”. Actually sit and think on it for like 2 minutes and you know the play every time. “Everyone I don’t like is a Nazi” or “Cory Booker and Barack Obama did it too” or “the left are the real nazis”. Truth is what you make it and they live by that lol

0

Anonymous #3 2w

Yeah? Why drop the term MSM? I asked you once and you completely went off on a harangue about ad homs as if you even give a flying fuck that you’re called that shit in the first place 🤣

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Dude you’re the one doing the projecting here. Facts do still have a truth value, they can be more or less likely to be true. We can still seek out better Information as opposed to just seeking out what we want to hear. By refusing to even evaluate the source or provide your own you’re just adding to the idea that nothing matters and we should all shut up and let America collapse in quiet

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Because all you’re doing is trying to make an argument that I’m an evil boot licking nazi because I used an acronym😭 there’s no point in entertaining that type of shit. The person you responded to was perfectly cordial, so I responded in kind

5

Anonymous #3 2w

🤣🤣 You’re still not addressing why you used it.

0

Anonymous #3 2w

You’re right that I couldn’t care less what an anonymous person online calls me. I’m not gonna get into a fit of rage like you’ve been since your first comment on this post

5

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

It’s an ACRONYM. I didn’t feel like assuming which news network you get your dog shit opinion from or which one led you to spew vitriol like you are, so I just generalized all of them.

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

I’m projecting yet you’re watching this moron not address why he used a very specific and intentional anti-intellectual term. You think being cordial is going to make this loser talk about it?

-1

Anonymous #3 2w

Still not answering it btw. Still dodging like I know you will continue to do lol.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I’m begging you to put down the phone and go outside, they even offer online therapy solutions. You seem like a genuinely unpleasant person and I hope you can change that

5

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

Again…you see what I mean? I’ve asked him 3 times now to answer what he meant by MSM and he won’t do it lol. His belief system isn’t that complicated.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Damn those Nazi fascists at… dictionary.com?

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I really don’t think you have any grounds to criticize someone’s intellectual merit when you refuse to even look at a source they provided for you or explain why you don’t think it’s trustworthy. And sure MSM isn’t an intellectual term but calling people morons and losers for disagreeing with you isn’t very academic either

3

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

Noooooooo that’s not what I meant by anti-intellectual. I’m saying that he’s using MSM INTENTIONALLY to deny any validity of sources he doesn’t approve of. For instance, if I link a Washington post or a New York Times story, that’s MSM to him. It doesn’t matter if anything in the story is true or not. To his standards, it’s not. That’s why truth isn’t an argument anymore. They don’t care.

0

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 2w

Like…HELLO?!?

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Because I hate seeing someone look like this, I will admit the God’s honest truth. I just used it to rage bait you and it has given me quite an entertaining bit of my evening. Edit: thanks for the gold kind stranger!

-1

Anonymous #3 2w

Hey, can’t say I was wrong for calling you out for what I knew you were the entire time 🤷‍♂️ Some people prefer chaos.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

You called me a lot worse than a rage basiter. I just think you’re really fucking stupid and know how much you let anonymous people control your mood. My sources still prove you wrong and you’re still legitimately psychotic for behaving the way you do on this app, I just wanted to benefit from your psychosis as much as possible

-2

Anonymous #3 2w

Just because I knew I used an acronym that would make you think I’m a Trump supporter doesn’t make me wrong😭

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Maybe bc local authorities and officials actually help ice and are working together with ice. Unlike local and state authorities in Minnesota. There’s a reason you don’t hear about anything in those states, bc ICE goes in, does their thing, and leaves.

3

Anonymous #5 2w

This guys a fucking nut job 5, get out while you can

1

Anonymous #3 2w

Yeah? You rage baited before or AFTER I called you shit? 🤣

0

Anonymous #5 2w

You don’t send a literal fucking army to a state for 100,000 people who are undocumented which means they’re kind of hard find when you’re not even going to get half of them in the first place. It’s just basic fucking logic. It’s an intimidation tactic and everyone knows it 😂

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

After you called OP a cocksucker and called bullshit on the claim I made instead of just asking for a source like how normal people interact. It was pretty clear from there that no good-faith discussion on ICE or this administration would happen

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

How many people do you consider an army? 2000-3000 people would be one of the smallest armies in the world. You’re right, sending in your guys outnumbered 50-33 to 1 is pretty irresponsible.

1

Anonymous #3 2w

Yeah because OP is the paragon of good faith. You’re such a fucking dipshit 😂 No one here thinks there was a legitimate discussion that OP was trying to have. They’re legit astroturfing hence why they haven’t commented on their own fucking thread

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Without sounding chronically online, I’ve seen you immediately resort to name calling in pretty much every comment section you’re in. I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, but you were a prick to me too soo

1

Anonymous #3 2w

You just said OP was trying to be good faith 🤣🤣🤣

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Where? I said there was no good faith argument to be had. I replied to you making genuinely false claims and you responded. I also provided a source disproving OP, so idk what you’re getting at. You’re both willfully ignorant, at least OP hasn’t come back and been an asshole too

1