Anonymous #2 1w

You got me 😔

1

Anonymous #1 1w

The antisemitism just won’t stop. Assuming I’m wealthy just bc I’m Jewish? That’s rich (no pun intended).

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

Even if you are or are not. You are supporting the zionist billionaire system.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

I think you pulled that out your ass like what?

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

Sure, because only zionists are billionaires😂No need to make your antisemitism even more apparent, I get the point.

0

Anonymous #3 1w

If you think I “pulled that out of my ass”, you clearly need to dig in yours more.

0

Anonymous OP 1w

Most are evangelical or Christian even worse

1

Anonymous OP 1w

No, no where on this post was the word Jewish. Like?? 😭😭🙏🏼🙏🏼 help antisemitism?????? 😭

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Zionism goes Hand In Hand with the Jewish identity. As #1 said, “zio”, which is a slur.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Im part jewish and i hate zionists. Idiot

8

Anonymous #1 1w

So then you hate me, aka a Jew, which is antisemitic.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

No. I hate , i hate current israeli gov, and i hate all banks, corporations, and stock exchanged .

1

Anonymous #1 1w

ALL? Even CDFI banks, which is community development financial institutions (just spelling it out for the uninformed)? MDIs (minority depository institutions)? Stock exchanges themselves are oppressive, maybe you hate the capitalist system itself and not the system that ensures the efficient transfer of capital?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Meant to say stock exchanges themselves are NOT oppressive. Looking forward to your response.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

False they are to people with little to no shares. And most banks are oppressive, capitalism is inherently

1

Anonymous OP 1w

The whole system is rigged to keep 90% of the small investors from making it.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Stock exchanges themselves don’t oppress anyone. It sounds like your issue is with capitalism itself, not the people trying to survive within it. Ever heard the saying don’t hate the player hate the game?

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Righht wing saying

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Stock exchanges are rigged should not exist at all

1

Anonymous #1 1w

You’ve said the same thing like three times but did still kit explain how. I’m also not right wing 😂 a stock exchange is a marketplace that serves investors by matching buyers to sellers. What specifically is oppressive or rigged about them? Please articulate clearly.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Generations of rich owning 99% of stock. How is it a public market like u say when a generational family wealth minority own and control everything. While if you are investing with a tiny amount and you are low income 99% you have almost no chance even with high returns.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Extreme socialism is the way forward whether capitalists and zionists like u accept it or not.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Which includes banning stock markets. Banks are a bit more iffy, banks are needed to safely store wealth.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

That’s a wealth inequality problem. Do you see how the problem would be exacerbated even more if there was no stock exchange and only the wealthy could invest/trade? It is a public market with no restrictions by the exchange itself, the only restriction is how much money you have (which is a wealth inequality or capitalism problem, not a problem with an exchange itself).

0

Anonymous OP 1w

No because a ban on stock exchanges would also include: Forced liquidation of “whales” Insane capital gains taxes Redistribution in the form of tax rebates

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Banks and corporate bonds would still exist.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Your issue is with ownership, which is correlated to the wealth inequality problem. Stock exchanges provide a way for individual investors to own companies no matter how much money they have. If they were banned only the wealthy would own stocks and make the thing you hate even more prevalent

1

Anonymous OP 1w

In socialist countries this has been achieved before, USSR, maos china, DPRK.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

A ban on stock exchanges wouldn’t cause people to liquidate shares. It would make them unable to trade them or sell them without them being matched to a buyer. It would cause a private marketplace where the poor couldn’t participate for having too little liquidity.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Are you seriously trying to reform the US using the USSR, China, and DPRK as examples? That’s a piss poor argument.

0

Anonymous OP 1w

Stocks would be frozen at current prices and sold and the gov would be the buyer.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

I wouldn’t talk about things you don’t understand if I were you.

0

Anonymous OP 1w

Remember this is under a hypothetical soviet style gov so this would all make sense

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Many civil rights of rich ppl will be suspended but this is a good thing. Smaller holders will be reimbursed in full.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

I am talking about banning stocks with a total gov bailout for the 99% and seizure of the “whales” stocks.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Yes those are based countries by the worker and for the worker. Ive been to russia and most of the bad stuff said is total western/nato propaganda

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Banning an exchange wouldn’t do that uou would need to ban profuse ownership of companies completely. Again, not an issue with an exchange, which simply matches buyers to sellers. Would you ban Kalshi as well? Novig? Any others sports marketplace exchanges? An exchange is simply investors trading against other investors, your hate is misguided.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Those are new fintechs. Yes they are scams and should be banned. And NOT bailed out, send the owners to jail. Dumb investors out of luck lmaooo

1

Anonymous OP 1w

No. The gov has REPEATEDLY bailed out brokerages, banks, and the stock exchange via proxy.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Those billionaires will need to pay a severe price

1

Anonymous OP 1w

No reply? lol.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Bruh it was 1am I went to bed 😂 those are not fintechs, they are exchanges for sports and other events. You have a severe misunderstanding of what a stock exchange is and does. If you want to ban banks, private ownership, etc, that’s an issue with capitalism. Stock exchanges let everyone participate fairly in the market by allowing them to buy shares. By banning an exchange the wealthy wouldn’t liquidate their shares they would be held privately.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

No reply? lol.

1