
it was "let in the white man so he can poison the land and indigenous people, mutilate them, r*pe them and steal from them, even though they taught them how to survive and thrive in these lands" which is a pretty shit foundation anyway. idk why some of y'all are so hellbent on gobbling the nuts of evil, cruel, greedy people, past or present
it's not up to you because you wouldn't pass the 101 courses required to admit anybody to anything. existing conflicts is not the same as being "largely at war" and even a rudimentary understanding of the english language would allow somebody to understand this. 12 might've been too large a number
existing conflicts are not the same as being "largely at war". war was a last resort in most cases. nations were largely cohabitating and cooperating. you're uneducated and unintelligent. fortunately both of those can be fixed. unfortunately i'm not confident you have the intellectual capacity
full concession that the western nations were actually the ones "largely at war". full concession that you're demanding they be good at war while falsely criticizing them for being "largely at war". wow you're bad at this. good luck kiddo. you'll need it. oh and don't forget your helmet!