Anonymous #6 5w

“HEY YOU COMMIES, IF ANYONE IS GONNA RAPE VENEZUELA FOR ITS OIL, ITS GONNA BE ME!”

47

Anonymous #5 5w

Lmao kinda brain dead take. We will give them a much better price. And better working conditions. Either way trump said he won't control it so we will have to wait and see.

-12

Anonymous #2 5w

Very nice

-4

Anonymous #2 5w

really got me with the photo

1

Anonymous #6 5w

He literally said we will run Venezuela but okay

28

Anonymous #6 5w

Keep doing damage control for pedophile that’s engaging in acts of war without congressional approval and sends more fighter jet contracts to Israel while his tariffs cause stagflation, you’re doing great

24

Anonymous #5 5w

As in help them control the government yes

-10

Anonymous #5 5w

No proof of him being a pedophile and almost every president has done this except two you buffoon

-10

Anonymous #6 5w

There’s quite literally heaps of evidence that points towards him being a pedophile sex trafficker and the fact that his DOJ is still actively redacting more documents that are already overdue for release, you have to be smoking industrial strength copium to still think he’s innocent

30

Anonymous #5 5w

you mean Virginia Giuffre why don't you look up her testimony. This is a really bad look gang do your research. :)

-4

Anonymous #5 5w

let me trust some x post too nice

-5

Anonymous #6 5w

the photos of him were in fact removed from the files

16

Anonymous #6 5w

but you were right i looked it up they actually released the photo

0

Anonymous #6 5w

Being smug about defending a pedophile is insane he’s not gonna fuck you bro you’re not a minor

26

Anonymous #5 5w

Alright nice you got me gang. No evidence beaten in an argument what do you do attack me instead goated play dog

-5

Anonymous #5 5w

you left out two pretty important parts of your evidence congrats

-4

Anonymous #5 5w

it's even funnier cause you posted the photo they redacted

0

Anonymous #6 5w

Wait let me guess are the two parts that A) he campaigned on releasing the files and B) the DOJ has already shelled out over $1 Milly in overtime pay for redactors on an already overdue release ☺️

4

Anonymous #5 5w

would you rather then not get paid?

-1

Anonymous #6 5w

Seems a little scummy

-1

Anonymous #5 5w

he's released the files btw so he did what he said he would

0

Anonymous #6 5w

Yeah I don’t think we should be paying people to protect sex traffickers, it’s weirder that you think they should be getting paid to be quite honest with you

5

Anonymous #6 5w

The release in question

5

Anonymous #5 5w

I mean if people are working they get paid it's how a job works. But i agree with you wish more of it wasn't redacted however I hate to break it to you it's a department of justice issue. Not really Trumps he's not paying them You are!

0

Anonymous #5 5w

Again as I stated at least he released it Biden had how many years to do so. And it's a DOJ issue. I'd be more mad at them.

0

Anonymous #6 5w

“It’s the DOJ’s fault” you mean the DOJ that he’s completely usurped and installed loyalists in?

6

Anonymous #5 5w

how does any of that even prove trump was there?

0

Anonymous #6 5w

If people are working to protect pedophiles, then they should be treated like pedophiles ✨✨✨✨✨

6

Anonymous #6 5w

There was literally a deleted file with Trumps photo but sure

9

Anonymous #5 5w

Brother you need to get more sun. The Dem fear mongering is bad for the health

-1

Anonymous #6 5w

“Biden should’ve done it” if Biden had done it you would’ve screamed and cried witch hunt please be serious

12

Anonymous #7 5w

The released the photo lmao

-1

Anonymous #5 5w

Okay i don't disagree your anger is in the wrong place though.

-1

Anonymous #6 5w

Brother you need to stop glazing a pedophile that’s using your tax dollars to engage in wars at the nudge of oil executives and Israeli war criminals

6

Anonymous #6 5w

Not everything is released and some documents got taken back lmao

5

Anonymous #5 5w

So you would sink to the same level the maga hicks you hate would for what reason?

-1

Anonymous #5 5w

I love this lol no war was started

-1

Anonymous #7 5w

You're correct they are going to continue releasing documents through this month. You can use google to look this stuff up.

0

Anonymous #6 5w

For the reason that civility politics have gone completely out the window since his first term and have only been used to justify cruel acts inflicted upon the impoverished of other countries

9

Anonymous #5 5w

Dawg what are you talking about

-1

Anonymous #5 5w

here's a real pedo

-1

Anonymous #6 5w

lol, lmao even, let them both burn, I don’t care, treat the pedophiles the same

15

Anonymous #5 5w

I don't even think we are far off in our beliefs your anger is just in the wrong spot

0

Anonymous #6 5w

Notice how Trump’s DOJ hasn’t arrested Bill Clinton yet either (if he does, he gets to testify, which would be very bad for his pedophile friends, like the president 🥰)

9

Anonymous #6 5w

No mother fucker it’s not you should be pissed that he’s fucking lying to you

6

Anonymous #5 5w

The problem is idk if he can't be arrested due to federal due process idk if anyone can be seeing as the case has already happened

-1

Anonymous #6 5w

That was under Bush btw

-1

Anonymous #6 5w

Oh so now we give a fuck about due process!

8

Anonymous #5 5w

He's not lying gangalang

0

Anonymous #5 5w

Yes

1

Anonymous #6 5w

What would need to happen for you to even begin to consider he might be a pedophile? Like what evidence do you need to see?

8

Anonymous #5 5w

Him actually being a pedophile, or even visiting the island. But there is none. And no witness has came forward and said he was there.

1

Anonymous #6 5w

Brother one of the victims that died “via suicide” (her entire head was missing) quite literally named him as one of the men that raped her on the island

8

Anonymous #5 5w

what was her name E. Jean Carroll?

-2

Anonymous #6 5w

She’s alive now you’re just being disingenuous

5

Anonymous #5 5w

I'm asking who you were talking about with the head cut off thing. I can't find anything about this do you have a name?

0

Anonymous #6 5w

we literally created a power vacuum for corruption to run even more rampant now 💀💀💀 do we just not remember the middle east?

14

Anonymous #9 5w

Iraq happened because we withdrew these country ls can't support themselves. There's not really a power vacuum there they already elected an official there president stole the election. Just look it up gang

0

Anonymous #6 5w

🌚you think they elected a president already? currently the person running venezuela is trump, marco rubio, pete hegseth, and the VP of venezuela. Any leader apart of the maudro regime will be seen as a traitor to directly work with the americans. on top of the push back from the locals bc yes they’re happy their dictator is gone. but they dont want an american shill to replace it and use them as cheap labor for the Us goals.

8

Anonymous #9 5w

Edmundo González. I thought you guys were against dictators. Maduro was one.

0

Anonymous #6 5w

its sad to see American citizens cant see how imperialist nature radicalizes more people than helps. Venezuelan children will grow to hate the US if soldiers are on the ground in uniform, other countries will try to display their dominance and do the same thing we just did russia already is, now china just got their invitation to approach taiwan. theres levels to foreign entanglements its never A = B and thats it.

11

Anonymous #9 5w

1 you are american 2 we aren't imperialist. 3 venezuelan are praising trump 4 other countries were destroying their economy. Right now the truth is the future of venezuela is uncertain which is better than a future under a dictator. It's sad to see libs don't even know what the believe in anymore

-2

Anonymous #6 5w

1. im not a lib. 2.never said i wasnt american. 3.we are stripping venezuela for its resources and using them for our gain and threatened other countries if they dont tow the line as well. (textbook definition of imperialism) 4. we can’t even get our own economy in line how are we going to help another’s 🤣

9

Anonymous #9 5w

Sure you're not a lib lemme guess socialist textbook we aren't using them for our gain yet. Either way i'd rather us use them then china and russia

-2

Anonymous #6 5w

america at large is and forever will be an imperialist nation, its why the industrial complex is alive, its why capitol hill only votes in unison for more military packages and aid. AMERICA LOVES WAR. and i find it so funny how maga changes its tune when their leader suddenly tells them to get over their morals and values. every elected official works and answers to us its about time yall start to realize that bro.

14

Anonymous #9 5w

i mean we have no colonies but sure and we didn't go to war with venezuela.

-2

Anonymous #9 5w

Also what maga morals have changed i think it's funny libs have changed their tune. nobody celebrated the ceasefires nobody celebrates the capture of a dictator what happened to no kings. And you guys are apparently accepting until it's jews. You don't have any morals. if you accept everything you have no direction. and your states are riddled with fraud and scum politicians.

-1

Anonymous #6 5w

Y’all always change your goddamn tunes everytime your lord and savior tells you. The ceasefires weren’t celebrated cause they were always broken shortly after. Capturing Maduro sadly isn’t gonna do anything if he’s replaced with someone worse (and US is apparently taking over until that happens). Y’all act like you accept Jews as well. Don’t talk morals with all the hatred that goes on in your side and the fact that your side tried to cover up one of the biggest scandals in the U.S.

14

Anonymous #7 5w

nobody broke the ceasefires tho... And he's not going to be. Yall doomers have no hope. The US taking over would prevent the previously mentioned statement to not happen. So you're admiring you don't like jews. who commits more acts of political violence? And what scandal

-3

Anonymous #6 5w

nobody broke the ceasefire??? WHAT LMAO

11

Anonymous OP 5w

My bad i miss read something you are correct they have broken the ceasefire israel has i mean

-2

Anonymous #6 5w

either way I don't really care about palestine they started the was. It's bad kids are dying that's about all i care about. Most palestinian people would choose to destroy our country if they could

-4

Anonymous #6 5w

odd thing to say

6

Anonymous OP 5w

how if south korea started destroying china would you care or poland started destroying russia

0

Anonymous #6 5w

Israel broke ceasefire so many times lmfao. I never said I didn’t like Jews but with the amount of antisemitism rightwingers spew, y’all are no better. Also right wing extremists commit more political violence LMAO. And I’m literally talking about Epstein

12

Anonymous #7 5w

No they haven't. Wdym Biden could have released the files

-1

Anonymous #7 5w

Again why should i care about a country that would destroy us if they could

0

Anonymous #6 5w

venezuela is literally our colony now here’s your president saying we will control venezuela until a proper transition takes place which he gives no timeline or outline as to when or what that looks like. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZThdLePxS/

14

Anonymous #9 5w

Bro you think they'd have a timeline a few hours after liberating them... nice

-3

Anonymous #6 5w

Bruh what? Literally there are innocents being killed. Also Israel would do the same thing to us if we weren’t buddy buddy with them

8

Anonymous #6 5w

Biden didn’t campaign on releasing them tho.

8

Anonymous #6 5w

Man y’all love to defend this people

5

Anonymous #7 5w

But that's the thing we are buddy buddy with them so they won't that's how it works...

-1

Anonymous #7 5w

Trump is releasing them doj is redacting them. Either way what a dumb point "well he didn't run on it so it doesn't matter" Yall just wanna be mad

-1

Anonymous #7 5w

Love it

-1

Anonymous #11 5w

Your logic: “I’m anti American murders” “AHAH!!!! YOU BEING AGAINST AMERICANS KILLING PEOPLE IS ANTI AMERICAN” 🤡

26

Anonymous #12 5w

Yep

-10

Anonymous #11 5w

did you think this was a gotcha moment?

24

Anonymous #6 5w

….ur literally trolling how old are u💀

4

Anonymous #9 5w

i'm 10 nah not trolling tho

1

Anonymous #11 5w

White nationalist ahh logic

28

Anonymous #13 5w

That is a crazy assumption but alright

-7

Anonymous #13 5w

Cœur D’Alene, ID coded

1

Anonymous #6 5w

If you believe simply having the words anti and American in the same sentence give off the idea that someone is entirely anti-American even if the sentiment is against a morally reprehensible action by the US government, I’m going to assume you’re a nationalist, and probably a white one at that. So sorry king. 💀

9

Anonymous #13 5w

ah i thought it was bad to make assumptions tho. Pretty regressive

0

Anonymous #6 5w

Nice try at a gotcha moment but idrgaf if someone makes an assumption I’m afraid. 😕 I find that significantly less morally reprehensible than breaking international laws to instill a US puppet state for oil.

6

Anonymous #13 5w

So you throw away morals because someone else does... which i disagree with but sure

-2

Anonymous #6 5w

I don’t believe an assumption is morally wrong. It’s a biological/psychological phenomenon seen in almost every species. You know what’s not seen in every species? Invading foreign nationals for oil.

6

Anonymous #13 5w

We didn't invade gangalang yk what's wrong dictators.

-1

Anonymous #6 5w

Sending troops to kidnap a foreign leader and dropping bombs on foreign entities is a form of invasion king??

6

Anonymous #6 5w

I’m not saying dictators are not wrong, and I’m not saying the US couldn’t have removed him from power had the government gone through channels of international approval. That’s where is becomes wrong, not the removal of a dangerous dictator in general.

4

Anonymous #13 5w

a foreign dictator who elected himself. Also we immediately left Queen. No invasion no troops stationed

0

Anonymous #13 5w

what international channels china and russia in the eu?

0

Anonymous #6 5w

You don’t have to keep troops on foreign grounds for invasion. The moment we went there with troops and weapons without international approval, it was an invasion. Just because the invasion is technically over does not mean there was legally no invasion at any point.

6

Anonymous #6 5w

Yeah you know that thing that literally keeps us from the brink of another world war, the United Nations. I know most trump supporters don’t have a lick of understanding of international laws or charters, but as a member state of the United Nations we should probably follow the laws put in place, and ask for approval. 🤯

3

Anonymous #13 5w

i mean in the exact definition you are correct however we still did the correct thing in taking him outa there

0

Anonymous #6 5w

It’s not about the removal being correct or incorrect. It’s about the international implications of a first world foreign entity entering a foreign country without international approval. Have y’all even thought about how that may affect international relations? It’s not “yay no dictator” black and white. 🤦‍♂️

4

Anonymous #13 5w

International relations with WHO? who wiuld disagree with this move china russia mexico?

0

Anonymous #6 5w

Um yes??? Why are you dropping major world powers like having worse relations with them would not be disastrous? China is pissed. Do you not know we’ve been trying to stop them from invading Taiwan for YEARS. And don’t say “Taiwan should defend itself” because the moment china invades Taiwan, they control a huge chunk of the CPU market, which could impact our economy exponentially.

4

Anonymous #13 5w

china will never try to take taiwan because unlike china we'd actually step in. Our worse relations with these country's won't have an effect on that conflict

0

Anonymous #6 5w

There’s that nationalistic thinking again! “America is big and strong and china fears us.” Newsflash, they don’t, and they’re not afraid of war, they were trying to avoid more economic sanctions. Respectfully, believing that china, Russia and NK together could absolutely demolish our military is possibly the biggest glaze of America I’ve ever seen. Also hate to be the bearer of bad news, but china just put itself in a more respectable position on the international stage in terms of the UN.

12

Anonymous #13 5w

Correction: couldnt* destroy our military is a glaze

6

Anonymous #6 5w

You know, yall could just be normal Americans and go, “I support the removal of a violent dictator, but not going through official channels was wrong on the presidents part”, but you literally can’t help but gag on his agenda.

5

Anonymous #13 5w

Newsflash they do they didn't step in for a reason. And they aren't just scared of us they are scared of each other. And yes i am nationalist i love my country. Our military has more training then theirs we spend more money on ours we have a way larger and more advanced navy we would crush them. and the UN is our bitch it will be for a very long time. We have never been sanctioned once

-3

Anonymous #13 5w

Gaging on it hard !!!

-3

Anonymous #6 5w

Oh wow how does it feel to be such a redneck low iq embarrassment to the rest of the first world? 🎤

8

Anonymous #6 5w

“Scared of each other” and their entire alliance is the enemy of my enemy is my friend. If worst comes to worst, they will side with each other. “Our military has more training than theirs… we would crush them”. No amount of training matters and no one is crushing anyone in a full scale world war between every major superpower.

8

Anonymous #13 5w

i'm not a red neck i'm from the Chi and seeing as most of our country voted red i think i'm doing pretty good

0

Anonymous #6 5w

The red wave isn't a uniquely american thing btw

0

Anonymous #13 5w

Eh that's all speculation but so is saying we'd crush them we don't really know what would happen. If it went nuclear everyone would die. I'd say our military with other un nations would kill them pretty fast.

0

Anonymous #6 5w

Because Kamala was an awful candidate. Respectfully, any popular democrat would’ve blew him out of the water. 💀 Talk to me when midterms roll around bub. This administration is getting demolished in the house. Believing that “most of the country voted red” is true when less people voted this last cycle compared to the past cycle is insane cope.

4

Anonymous #13 5w

Alright 3 million less people voted you have a point who knows how'd they vote. if they all would have voted blue then that's a really sad sign about the democratic party's turnout rate. Mid terms are going to be mixed as they pretty much always are i doubt any major upsets will happen

0

Anonymous #6 5w

There’s something we can agree on, the democrats turn out rate is quite sad. However, that has a lot to do with the fact that an awful candidate who could form a comprehensible agenda and wasn’t even elected was the democratic candidate. The lack of transparency towards her agenda pushed away a lot of far leaning voters, and the fact that she wasn’t elected negated a lot of moderate/independent voters. And that can agree there won’t be upset in the senate, but even republican officials are

6

Anonymous #6 5w

Nervous because of house projections.

2

Anonymous OP 5w

Yes

1

Anonymous #13 5w

no it's because the democratic party is self eating which is a debate i don't want to get into right now and projections projected trump would lose... but he didn't

0

Anonymous xi.jinping 5w

Pro-Ukraine and Pro-Palestine? It just sounds like anti-imperialism

27

Anonymous #6 5w

1. Congressional projections tend to be far more accurate than president projections for many reasons 2. If the Democratic Party is “eating itself” then the Republican Party must be putting a gun to its head and pulling the trigger. At least leftists and moderates on the dem side can agree with each other on certain issues. On the rep side, you say something bad about trump and you’re outcasted. Ex. MTG, Liz Cheney

3

Anonymous #13 5w

Nah because conservatism is more of a reaction there's more diversity of thought the ability to adapt.. I guess we will see what happens with the elections congress might go blue. either way 12-20 percent less people vote in those elections so the presidential one is more of a show of what side has the nations support

-1