Anonymous #1 4d

Aside from the fact that you’re wrong, I keep forgetting. Does MAGA want people to have more kids or not?

22

Anonymous #2 4d

No. Poor People should be WORKING. Not having 5-7 kids.

3

Anonymous #1 4d

They are working

19

Anonymous #2 4d

They can work harder

-11

Anonymous #3 4d

She gave them more time to process it, for a more likely favorable ruling

9

Anonymous #1 4d

But why not just do that before? They have full control of the government; they can reduce the SNAP program legally by legislation. This just seems like indiscriminate .. no reason? /gen

8

Anonymous OP 4d

I dont care

-5

Anonymous #4 4d

People making money off of abusing the government, you say?

15

Anonymous OP 4d

It’s because that’s not really why they’re doing it. They spent more money to destroy USAID food than it would’ve taken to destroy it. The cruelty is the point.

6

Anonymous #2 4d

Lmao. I like how you think that that’s a trump card, no pun intended.

-6

Anonymous #1 4d

On my friend says this is to make the shutdown worse so that Democrats will fold and reopen the government I guess that makes half sense in an accelerationist POV

4

You don’t want me to point out the truth? Sounds like it’s not a very sound position to hold if that makes you mad.

15

Anonymous OP 4d

Still though, to me, blocking snap just makes me blame republicans more, not want to fold in healthcare

4

Anonymous OP 4d

They’re just playing a game of “I’ll take away your food until you let me take away your healthcare”, and I’m not sure why they think it’ll make people think they’re on the right side of things.

3

Anonymous #3 4d

She simply said to wait until the First Circuit issues a judgment

1

Anonymous #1 4d

Red states are majority conservative…

6

Anonymous #2 4d

It’s not the truth. Politicians making money doesn’t inherently mean that they abuse government. What’s Nancy’s net worth? The dude was rich before he got elected. Many people on snap, however, abuse the system by selling their food stamps, living off of snap for generations, there are jobs out there that tell people what to put in applications to try and get the most money out of these social programs. It’s wrong.

-5

Anonymous #5 4d

https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/190-snap-wtf this explains it a bit

0

Lmao. If anyone has been given an order it’s you. Try and maybe develop your brain and think before you spew garbage all the time.

-4

Anonymous #1 4d

buddy this sounds a lot like a certain german dictator

2

Anonymous #4 4d

Did you miss the part where it said $3B increase? Or this too?

11

Anonymous OP 4d

If you want to get far fetched and conspiratorial with it, I’ve seen some say he wants to make life so bad for the average American that riots break out, giving him an excuse to start deploying more troops or even declaring martial law

3

The fuck kind of barely disguised fetish is this?

3

Anonymous #1 4d

Able bodied adults on SNAP are required to work at least 80 hours a month

6

Anonymous #1 4d

“Work makes you free” ass comment

1

Anonymous #4 4d

Yall say that every time he does stuff like this. He wants to get rid of it entirely. If he wanted to fix that system he would have aimed for reforming it instead of eliminating it

1

Anonymous #3 4d

first circuit judges are more liberal

1

Anonymous #15 3d

It’s not free though, it’s societally funded, and I think it’s a sign of a healthy society to take care of those in need, actually.

1

Anonymous #15 3d

Your argument seems to be built on foundational beliefs in the effectiveness of capitalism and the ability of modern-day Americans to climb the social ladder, so while I could try to give insight into that, I don’t feel like writing five paragraphs. Instead, because of the insane equivalence you made between social assistance programs and slavery, I’m going to be an asshole and just say INTERESTING HOW YOU SUDDENLY CARE ABOUT SLAVERY NOW, AND NOT WHEN IT’S LITERALLY BEING USED IN OUR PRISONS

3

Anonymous #10 3d

You do know prisoners are paid for their labor it may be something like $.60 an hour but they are not being forced to do it, on top of that the first ~$1k that they make in prison is saved For when the prisoner gets out so that they can get back on their feet. It may not be a lot of money, but they’re not being forced to do it

1

Anonymous #2 3d

So tell me this, when people stop working because they have all of their needs already met what’s going to happen?

0

Anonymous #15 3d

It’s literally below minimum wage, and you seem to misunderstand that social programs far from meet all needs. They just keep people afloat.

1

Anonymous #2 3d

Is #15 trying to say that food stamps are communism 😭

1

Anonymous OP 3d

No I’m not, they are an example of why communism/socialism won’t work though. Our gov can’t agree on something (like it normally can’t) and now 42 million people lost access to food (even if they were abusing the system)

1