Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Hot take, it’s not unreasonable for me to believe my homie over some random lady I never met before. I’d never be friends with an abuser of any kind, and yes it’s important to believe victims, but I’d need proof that it happened before deciding he’s evil
upvote 3 downvote

🫕
Anonymous 5w

I agree but as soon as it’s TWO women who my homie’s dated, I gotta go ahead and cut the mf off. One ex saying he did some crazy shit, I can believe him when he says she’s lying. Soon as I see a 2nd ex making eerily similar accusations? Yeah, homie’s gotta go.

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Needing some sort of proof before final judgment is fair but the accusation does warrant some belief on the victims end to engage in looking for that evidence

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

Yeah I’m not denying that, but the way some people behave is “oh someone said this man is an abuser? You need to believe the victim 100% and cannot even ask for evidence because you’re invaliding their experience” I wouldn’t be friends with an abuser, and if I knew he was one we wouldn’t be friends anymore. But I’d still need proof because none of my friends are like that

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> cheese_of_the_world_unite 5w

EXACTLY

upvote 1 downvote