Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
taking this here because i think it’s an interesting discussion, but in any case… the urinal being mentioned is probably the famous one, Fountain by Marcel Duchamp. it was rejected from an exhibition on the basis that it was not art. in 1917. not recent!

haiku_poster

The fact that no one is talking about the modern “art” CRISIS is horrible! People think that bananas and urinals are ART now??? This government affiliated University released a study about this:
-1 upvote, 1 comment. Sidechat image post by haiku_poster in Republican Rave. "The fact that no one is talking about the modern “art” CRISIS is horrible! People think that bananas and urinals are ART now??? This government affiliated University released a study about this:"
upvote 6 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

What quantitative metric do they measure “standards” by?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

Fountain is spoken about in art history classes because it pushed the view of art from craftsmanship to intention. a purposeful arrangement of some mass-produced kitchen tools, for instance, may result in something pleasing to the eye. the artist would be the one who did the arranging, but they did not actually craft the spatulas and spoons and whisks and so on.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

meanwhile the banana (presumably Comedian by Maurizio Cattelan, 2019) is in a similar vein. the banana itself is not regarded as an art piece the way a sculpture is. everyone understands the banana is simply a banana from a grocery store. but Comedian is about affixing this particular produce item in a particular manner in a gallery containing many more “proper” works. the banana’s existence in this space is… well, comedic.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

Art is subjective tho, and aren’t they the ones that don’t think humanities studies/degrees are valuable?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

For the record, I provide this information because I feel like the graphic is absurd. Art is always subjective, and comparing a van Eyck to a Rauschenberg for the explicit purpose of claiming one is “better” than the other isn’t going to work. Those are different sorts of art entirely. An individual may feel that one is more to their taste than the other, but that’s again a subjective decision

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

Comedian is also an example of an art piece that is meant to be interacted with and changed by the audience. the banana has been taken from the wall and eaten multiple times, by visitors and performers both. (Comedian is defined not by that particular banana, but a banana on the wall in this way at that angle and height.)

upvote 1 downvote