US Politics on Sidechat | He’s defending someone who was convicted for child sex trafficking. He is defending. Someone. who was convicted of taking children from their families and forcing these children to have sex with adults for money.

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

US Politics 9w

He’s defending someone who was convicted for child sex trafficking. He is defending. Someone. who was convicted of taking children from their families and forcing these children to have sex with adults for money.

This post is unavailable

Anonymous 9w

i don’t believe she was threatened in order to commit crimes with epstein. maybe she was threatened in order to continue after potentially wanting to stop. but epstein has no reason to threaten her. why would he need her specifically? it makes no sense.

Anonymous 9w

Because she was manipulated and blackmailed by Epstein. We don’t know if Epstein threatened to kill her and her whole family.

-2

Anonymous

#1 9w

So you don’t know something, and that’s your reason for defending someone who admitted to purposefully taking children, shoving them in front of adult men, and holding them down while the men fucked them?

Anonymous

#1 9w

idk but i feel like i choose death before i assisted in child trafficking

Anonymous

#2 9w

Maybe Epstein would’ve had her family killed too. We don’t know that. It’s easier to just say she’s guilty then actually investigate

Anonymous

#1 9w

Says the party that is actively withholding the Epstein files from the public. You want an investigation? There’s your answer.

Anonymous

#1 9w

You didn’t answer.

Anonymous

OP 9w

I wouldn’t be opposed to an investigation. But Epstein is already dead. Are we just gonna sentence him post humorously lol

Anonymous

#1 9w

Not an answer. Try again.