Anonymous #1 66w

Pointing out that the president is a child rapist is just the truth, not “insulting and belittling”. Maybe he shouldn’t have raped children.

38

Anonymous #2 66w

True, I think what 1 was trying to say (correct if I’m wrong 1) is that while the reason for disliking these people mentioned is valid. It seems that you hate the people more than you hate what they did, because they’re republican. Major assumptions being made here idk shit about either of you. But maybe

3

Anonymous #4 66w

whaf I'd say if I was coping with supporting with a known pedophile in the white house

23

Anonymous #6 66w

huh

-1

Anonymous #6 66w

trust me i don’t support trump, i think their all corrupt

0

Anonymous #4 66w

I hate this fake woke “both sides” equivocating bs lmao they’re still different and promote different policies like what the fuck are we doing?

11

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #1 66w

I stated a fact if you have a problem with it take it up with the pedo in chief

5

Anonymous #3 66w

Yes, this is the idea behind my comment, just worded significantly better. I would agree it’s necessary to call out politicians on their wrongdoings, but I don’t think we should be generalizing that behavior to those who share a political party with that individual. Saying that “all republicans want to take away access to abortions” or “all democrats want communism” is by no means conducive to forward progress.

-2

No, it is not by any means, I agree with you on that. However, OP’s statement, whether intentional or not, is worded so that the provided logic and reasoning behind, in this fictitious scenario, Glenn Quagmire being a Republican Party candidate is because he is a pedo.

-3

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous OP 66w

Well, yes and no. Glenn Quagmire is a pedo, but the statement that since he is a pedo it makes sense he’s a republican, is an unproductive generalization.

-3

I am not going to try to refute this claim as I cannot find any statistics on it. Would you be willing to share the source you are referring to as I do want to know what the actual breakdown is on the data, if there really is any.

-2

Anonymous #7 66w

I think what 4 may be aiming at is both sides ultimately, at least in the contemporary, serve themselves as opposed to the people.

3

Anonymous #4 66w

please read one book. literally any one single book. please

4

Anonymous #4 66w

100% George Washington is one of the only presidents to oppose sectionalism and political parties. Too much of politics is just a pissing contest against the other side.

3

Anonymous #1 66w

exactly

3