Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Republicans would've deported Jesus and called him a radical leftist propagandist
upvote 136 downvote

🎧
Anonymous 32w

I mean in fairness, Jesus WAS a radical leftist propagandist historically speaking. It’s just that that’s a compliment and Republicans seem to miss that part.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 32w

They would've compared him to people like Hasan Piker and put ((())) around his name

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 32w

This narrative kinda sucks if I’m being honest. Could it possibly be true? Yes. But what’s the point?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 32w

I don’t think Jesus would have said that America deserved 9/11

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 32w

No, he wouldn't, but his radical ideologies would've drawn the comparison anyway

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 32w

We did tho

upvote -2 downvote
🎧
Anonymous 32w

1. Jesus did not affirm the “traditional Jewish moral teachings” that were prevalent during His earthly ministry. That’s part of why the traditionalists hated Him so much. 2. Leftism doesn’t prescribe any particular sexual ethic beyond a strong commitment to consent, so there’s no conflict there. 3. Jesus said ppl should pay taxes because currency is an apparatus of the State anyway, but that no human institution can claim the self because GOD’S image is on each person. That’s super political.

upvote 8 downvote
🎧
Anonymous 32w

There are anachronistic, oversimplified ways of going about it, but to say that applying 1st Century theological principles to contemporary politics is *inherently* anachronistic and unacceptable is to reject much of the value of Scripture and the redemptive promise of the Gospel.

upvote 0 downvote
🎧
Anonymous 32w

It literally is what you said though. That’s what the words “Mapping 1st century theology into modern politics is dumb, it’s a gross oversimplification” mean when you string them together in that order. The fact of the matter is that Jesus did speak politically during His earthly ministry and that on the whole His political speech would be considered radically left-wing even by today’s standards.

upvote -2 downvote
🎧
Anonymous 32w

Yes, I’ve been a practicing, baptized Christian for twelve years.

upvote 2 downvote
🎧
Anonymous 32w

It’s not any more of an oversimplification than me saying “I am a Texan”. Just because it’s not the ENTIRETY of someone’s identity doesn’t make a true statement false. I stand by what I said because the words of Scripture show that it’s true. You’re right that our Lord doesn’t fit into any earthly party but that’s not what I’m doing.

upvote -2 downvote
🎧
Anonymous 32w

In terms of the point I was making? Yes. Both statements are true, both are wildly simplistic relative to the full scope of the person they reference. Also why the need for quotes around propagandist. That word isn’t inherently negative so I’m a little confused by that choice.

upvote -1 downvote