
That’s not how linguistic descriptivism works dude. “Knowing what you meant” ≠ saying words that reflected your meaning. It just means I successfully reverse-engineered your fuckup. That’s completely consistent with the descriptivist framework you’re trying to appeal to right now.
There’s actually not a difference when “not playing along” just means harassing and disrespecting people without fair cause. And anyway I grew up listening to conservatives incessantly mock trans people and express violent fantasies about jailing or worse for them. It’s hate, all the way down. It was frankly disturbing to witness so often as a child.
I don’t care what adults choose to do with their own bodies. I just don’t support minors making permanent medical decisions when their brains are still developing. If you are a trans adult, go have that surgery. It’s your money and body. And my other problem is that trans people think the surgery makes them biologically a a male or female and everybody acts obvious. If you are born man and chop your penis you still can’t have periods or get pregnancy. And I’d get canceled for telling them that
You’re defending everyone who does, saying they don’t hate trans people, and taking their side in SPITE of the medical evidence of what’s best for people. So I don’t care if you’re the worst of the worst, you’ve chosen your side and aren’t entitled to our open arms until you change for the better.
1) That’s not an acceptable way to act, and you’re still attacking all trans people when you do that. 2) It was an anon post what the FUCK are you smoking? You’re so obsessed with trans people you pulled that assumption all the way out of the asshole you wish was full of trans dick.
No I had blocked and unblocked someone in my DMs that was claiming to be trans. When I unblocked I saw that post get quoted. That’s how I knew it was them and thier trans. It was stemming from another debate on DMs. And you should’ve seen what else they called me